How to proceed when both normality and sphericity are violated in the repeated measures ANOVA
| dc.contributor.author | Blanca Mena, M. José | |
| dc.contributor.author | Alarcón Postigo, Rafael | |
| dc.contributor.author | Arnau Gras, Jaume | |
| dc.contributor.author | García Castro, Javier | |
| dc.contributor.author | Bono Cabré, Roser | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-18T18:19:29Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2025-02-18T18:19:29Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024-10 | |
| dc.date.updated | 2025-02-18T18:19:30Z | |
| dc.description.abstract | Adjusted F-tests have typically been proposed as an alternative to the F-statistic in repeated measures ANOVA. Despite considerable research, it remains unclear how these statistics perform under simultaneous violation of normality and sphericity. Accordingly, our aim here was to conduct a detailed examination of Type I error and power of the F-statistic and the Greenhouse-Geisser (F-GG) and Huynh-Feldt (F-HF) adjustments, manipulating the number of repeated measures (3-6), sample size (10-300), sphericity (epsilon estimator of Greenhouse-Geisser from its lower to upper limit), and distribution shape (slight to extreme deviations from normality). The findings show that the behavior of F-GG and F-HF depends on the degree of violation of both normality, sphericity, and sample size. Overall, we suggest using F-GG under violation of sphericity and slight or moderate deviations from normality in all sample size; with severe deviations from both normality and sphericity F-GG may be used with a sample size larger than 10; and with extreme deviation from both normality and sphericity this statistic may be used with a sample size larger than 30. In the event of discrepant results between F-GG and F-HF, the choice depends on the epsilon value. | |
| dc.format.extent | 15 p. | |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.identifier.idgrec | 741418 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0212-9728 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2445/218943 | |
| dc.language.iso | eng | |
| dc.publisher | Universidad de Murcia | |
| dc.relation.isformatof | Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.594291 | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Anales de Psicología, 2024, vol. 40, num.3, p. 466-480 | |
| dc.relation.uri | https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.594291 | |
| dc.rights | cc-by-nc-nd (c) Universidad de Murcia, 2024 | |
| dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
| dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |
| dc.source | Articles publicats en revistes (Psicologia Social i Psicologia Quantitativa) | |
| dc.subject.classification | Anàlisi de variància | |
| dc.subject.classification | Ciències socials | |
| dc.subject.classification | Models lineals (Estadística) | |
| dc.subject.other | Analysis of variance | |
| dc.subject.other | Social sciences | |
| dc.subject.other | Linear models (Statistics) | |
| dc.title | How to proceed when both normality and sphericity are violated in the repeated measures ANOVA | en |
| dc.title.alternative | Cómo proceder cuando se violan la normalidad y la esfericidad en el ANOVA de medidas repetidas | es |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
Fitxers
Paquet original
1 - 1 de 1