Amb motiu del tancament d'estiu, la validació de documents es reprendrà a partir del 28 d'agost de 2026. Disculpeu les molèsties.
Con motivo del cierre de verano, la validación de documentos se reanudará a partir del 28 de agosto de 2026. Disculpad las molestias
Due to the summer closure, document validation will resume starting August 28, 2026. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Document type

Working paper

Publication date

Publication license

cc-by-nc-nd, (c) Tadei, 2020
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/151497

Colonizer Identity and Trade in Africa: Were the British More Favourable to Free Trade?

Journal Title

Director/Tutor

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Related resource

Abstract

It has often been claimed that the structure of export trade between Africa and Europe during the colonial period depended on the colonizer identity, with the British relying on free trade and the French employing instead monopsonistic policies. Yet, due to the lack of systematic data on colonial trade, this claim has so far remained untested. In this paper, I use recently available data on export prices from African colonies to estimate monopsonistic profit margins for British and French trading companies. The results challenge the view of the British colonizers as champions of free trade. The level of profit margins was determined much more by the local conditions in Africa than by the identity of the colonial power. The British did not necessarily rely on free trade more than the French and did so only when a stronger control of trade was not a viable option.

Subject (English)

Citation

Citation

TADEI, Federico. Colonizer Identity and Trade in Africa: Were the British More Favourable to Free Trade?. UB Economics – Working Papers. 2020. Vol.  E20/399. [consulted: 16 of August of 2026]. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/151497

Export metadata

JSON - METS

Share record