Morbidity, outcomes and cost-benefit analysis of wildlife rehabilitation in Catalonia (Spain)

dc.contributor.authorMolina López, Rafael Angel
dc.contributor.authorMañosa, Santi
dc.contributor.authorTorres Riera, Alex
dc.contributor.authorPomarol, Manel
dc.contributor.authorDarwich, Laila
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-20T13:23:58Z
dc.date.available2018-04-20T13:23:58Z
dc.date.issued2017-07-18
dc.date.updated2018-04-20T13:23:58Z
dc.description.abstractBackground There are few studies of careful examination of wildlife casualties in Wildlife Rehabilitation Centers. These studies are essential for detecting menaces to wild species and providing objective criteria about cost-benefit of treatments in those centers. The release rate is considered the main outcome indicator, but other parameters such as length of stay at the center and a cost-benefit index expressed as number of released animals per euro and day, could be used as reliable estimators of the rehabilitation costs. Methodology A retrospective study based on 54772 admissions recorded from 1995-2013 in the database of the Wildlife Rehabilitation Center of Torreferrussa (Catalonia, NW Spain) assessed the morbidity, outcomes and cost-benefits of the rehabilitation practices. Results Three hundred and two species were included: 232 birds (n = 48633), 37 mammals (n = 3293), 20 reptiles (n = 2705) and 13 amphibians (n = 141). The most frequent causes of admission were: 39.8% confiscation of protected species (89.4% passerines), 31.8% orphaned young animals (35.3% swifts, 21.7% diurnal raptors and owls) and 17.4% trauma casualties (46.7% raptors and owls). The highest proportion of releases was found in the captivity confiscation category [87.4% passerines (median time of stay: 12 days)], followed by the orphaned category [78% owls (66 days), 76.5% diurnal birds of prey (43 days), 75.6% hedgehogs (49 days), 52.7% swifts (19 days) and 52% bats (55 days)]. For the trauma group, 46.8% of releases were hedgehogs (44 days) and 25.6% owls (103 days). As regards the cost-benefit index, the trauma casualties and infectious diseases had the worse values with 1.3 and 1.4 released animals/euro/day respectively, and were particularly low in raptors, waders, marine birds and chiroptera. On the contrary, captivity (4.6) and misplacement (4.1) had the best index, particulary in amphibian, reptiles and passerines. Conclusions/significance Cost-benefit studies including the release rate, the time of stay at the center and the costbenefit index should be implemented for improving management efficiency of the Wildlife Rehabilitation Centers.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec672994
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.pmid28719647
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/121740
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181331
dc.relation.ispartofPLoS One, 2017, vol. 12, num. 7, p. e0181331
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181331
dc.rightscc-by (c) Molina López, Rafael Angel et al., 2017
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals)
dc.subject.classificationMorbiditat
dc.subject.classificationMalalties dels ocells
dc.subject.classificationCatalunya
dc.subject.otherMorbidity
dc.subject.otherBirds diseases
dc.subject.otherCatalonia
dc.titleMorbidity, outcomes and cost-benefit analysis of wildlife rehabilitation in Catalonia (Spain)
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
672994.pdf
Mida:
5.81 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format