Comparison of three analytical methods for the determination of quinolones in pig muscle samples

dc.contributor.authorJiménez-Díaz, Inmaculada
dc.contributor.authorHermo Outeiral, Ma. del Pilar
dc.contributor.authorBallesteros, Óscar
dc.contributor.authorZafra-Gómez, Alberto
dc.contributor.authorBarrón Bueno, Dolores
dc.contributor.authorBarbosa Torralbo, José
dc.contributor.authorNavalón, Alberto
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-30T11:49:54Z
dc.date.available2014-01-30T11:49:54Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.date.updated2014-01-30T11:49:54Z
dc.description.abstractThis work presents a comparison between three analytical methods developed for the simultaneous determination of eight quinolones regulated by the European Union (marbofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, danofloxacin, enrofloxacin, difloxacin, sarafloxacin, oxolinic acid and flumequine) in pig muscle, using liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection (LC-FD), liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). The procedures involve an extraction of the quinolones from the tissues, a step for clean-up and preconcentration of the analytes by solid-phase extraction and a subsequent liquid chromatographic analysis. The limits of detection of the methods ranged from 0.1 to 2.1 ng g−1 using LC-FD, from 0.3 to 1.8 using LC-MS and from 0.2 to 0.3 using LC-MS/MS, while inter- and intra-day variability was under 15 % in all cases. Most of those data are notably lower than the maximum residue limits established by the European Union for quinolones in pig tissues. The methods have been applied for the determination of quinolones in six different commercial pig muscle samples purchased in different supermarkets located in the city of Granada (south-east Spain).
dc.format.extent16 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec621475
dc.identifier.issn0009-5893
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/49283
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer Verlag
dc.relation.isformatofVersió postprint del document publicat a: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10337-013-2435-5
dc.relation.ispartofChromatographia, 2013, vol. 76, num. 11-12, p. 707-713
dc.relation.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10337-013-2435-5
dc.rights(c) Springer Verlag, 2013
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Enginyeria Química i Química Analítica)
dc.subject.classificationCromatografia de líquids
dc.subject.classificationFluorescència
dc.subject.classificationEspectrometria de masses
dc.subject.classificationQuinolones
dc.subject.classificationPorc
dc.subject.classificationMúsculs
dc.subject.otherLiquid chromatography
dc.subject.otherFluorescence
dc.subject.otherMass spectrometry
dc.subject.otherQuinolone antibacterial agents
dc.subject.otherSwine
dc.subject.otherMuscles
dc.titleComparison of three analytical methods for the determination of quinolones in pig muscle samples
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
621475.pdf
Mida:
112.03 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format