Differences in ammonium oxidizer abundance and N uptake capacity between epilithic and epipsammic biofilms in an urban stream

dc.contributor.authorBernal Berenguer, Susana
dc.contributor.authorSegarra, Anna
dc.contributor.authorMerbt, Stephanie Nikola
dc.contributor.authorMartí Roca, Eugènia
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-13T18:53:01Z
dc.date.available2019-03-13T18:53:01Z
dc.date.issued2017-10-17
dc.date.updated2019-03-13T18:53:01Z
dc.description.abstractThe capacity of stream biofilms to transform and assimilate N in highly N-loaded streams is essential to guarantee the water quality of freshwater resources in urbanized areas. However, the degree of N saturation experienced by urban streams and their response to acute increases in N concentration are largely unknown. We measured changes in the rates of NH4+ uptake (UNH4) and oxidation (UAO) resulting from experimental increases in NH4+-N concentration in mature biofilms growing downstream of a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) and, thus, naturally exposed to high N concentration. We investigated the responses of UNH4 and UAO to NH4+-N increases and the abundance of NH4+ oxidizing bacteria and archaea (AOB and AOA) in epilithic and epipsammic biofilms. UNH4 and UAO increased with increasing NH4+-N concentration for the 2 biofilm types, suggesting no N saturation under ambient levels of NH4+-N. Thus, these biofilms can contribute to mitigating N excesses and the variability of NH4+-N concentrations from WWTP effluent inputs. The 2 biofilm types exhibited different Michaelis-Menten kinetics, indicating different capacity to respond to acute increases in NH4+-N concentration. Mean UNH4 and UAO were 5× higher in epilithic than epipsammic biofilms, coinciding with a higher abundance of AOA+AOB in the former than in the later (76 × 104 vs 14 × 104 copies/cm2). AOB derived from active sludge dominated in epilithic biofilms, so our results suggest that WWTP effluents can strongly influence in-stream NH4+ processing rates by increasing N inputs and by supplying AOA+AOB that are able to colonize some stream habitats
dc.format.extent10 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec677469
dc.identifier.issn2161-9549
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/130299
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherThe University of Chicago Press
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1086/696267
dc.relation.ispartofFreshwater Science, 2017, vol. 37, num. 1, p. 13-22
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1086/696267
dc.rights(c) The Society for Freshwater Science, 2017
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals)
dc.subject.classificationBiofilms
dc.subject.classificationPlantes
dc.subject.classificationNitrogen
dc.subject.otherBiofilms
dc.subject.otherPlants
dc.subject.otherNitrogen
dc.titleDifferences in ammonium oxidizer abundance and N uptake capacity between epilithic and epipsammic biofilms in an urban stream
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
677469.pdf
Mida:
302.15 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format