Carregant...
Fitxers
Tipus de document
TesiVersió
Versió publicadaData de publicació
Llicència de publicació
Si us plau utilitzeu sempre aquest identificador per citar o enllaçar aquest document: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/125133
La tentativa en los delitos de peligro abstracto
Títol de la revista
Autors
Director/Tutor
ISSN de la revista
Títol del volum
Recurs relacionat
Resum
[spa] En un desconcertante contexto de imparable expansionismo penal, desde hace años la doctrina mantiene un intenso debate acerca del contenido de injusto de los llamados delitos de peligro abstracto, sobre todo en cuanto a la compatibilidad de los mismos con los principios de lesividad y proporcionalidad, sin que a fecha de hoy la discusión pueda darse aún por cerrada. Si se descarta la posibilidad de configurar ilícitos penales meramente formales, basados en la simple desobediencia al imperativo de conducta contenido en la norma primaria, inmediatamente después surge la duda de si es factible proceder a una restricción teleológica de dicha tipología delictiva. El presente estudio pretende responder afirmativamente a esta cuestión y a tal fin se propone contribuir a sentar las bases para la elaboración de una auténtica dogmática de los delitos de peligro abstracto a partir de los parámetros que proporciona la teoría de la imputación objetiva en un marco netamente constitucional, singularmente los vinculados a la dogmática de la tentativa. Más concretamente, se somete a contraste la hipótesis según la que la tentativa inidónea operaría como cláusula de mínima lesividad de toda conducta penalmente relevante. En el campo de los delitos de peligro abstracto, lo anterior obliga a focalizar la atención tanto en su objeto como en su técnica de protección. Por lo tanto, sin negar de forma general la legitimidad de los delitos peligro abstracto, la presente investigación aspira a identificar algunos límites a su creación e interpretación, de modo que la renuncia al modelo del llamado Derecho Penal nuclear o clásico sea compatible con las exigencias y las garantías propias de un programa de Derecho Penal mínimo.
[eng] In a disconcerting context of unstoppable criminal expansionism, for years the doctrine maintains an intense debate about the unjust content of the so-called crimes of abstract danger, especially as regards the compatibility of the same with the principles of damage and proportionality, without that to date of today the discussion can still be closed. If the possibility of configuring purely criminal offenses, based on simple disobedience to the conduct imperative contained in the primary norm, is discarded, immediately afterwards the question arises whether it is feasible to proceed to a teleological restriction of said criminal typology. The present study tries to answer affirmatively to this question and for this purpose it is proposed to contribute to lay the foundations for the elaboration of an authentic dogmatic of the crimes of abstract danger from the parameters provided by the theory of objective imputation in a purely constitutional framework , especially those linked to the dogmatics of the attempt. More specifically, the hypothesis according to which the inadequate attempt would operate as a clause of minimum damage of all criminally relevant behaivor is put under test. In the field of abstract danger crimes, the foregoing obliges us to focus attention on both its object and its protection technique. Therefore, without denying in a general way the legitimacy of abstract danger crimes, the present investigation aspires to identify some limits to its creation and interpretation, so that the rejection of the so-called nuclear or classic Criminal Law model is compatible with the requirements and the guarantees of a minimum Criminal Law program.
[eng] In a disconcerting context of unstoppable criminal expansionism, for years the doctrine maintains an intense debate about the unjust content of the so-called crimes of abstract danger, especially as regards the compatibility of the same with the principles of damage and proportionality, without that to date of today the discussion can still be closed. If the possibility of configuring purely criminal offenses, based on simple disobedience to the conduct imperative contained in the primary norm, is discarded, immediately afterwards the question arises whether it is feasible to proceed to a teleological restriction of said criminal typology. The present study tries to answer affirmatively to this question and for this purpose it is proposed to contribute to lay the foundations for the elaboration of an authentic dogmatic of the crimes of abstract danger from the parameters provided by the theory of objective imputation in a purely constitutional framework , especially those linked to the dogmatics of the attempt. More specifically, the hypothesis according to which the inadequate attempt would operate as a clause of minimum damage of all criminally relevant behaivor is put under test. In the field of abstract danger crimes, the foregoing obliges us to focus attention on both its object and its protection technique. Therefore, without denying in a general way the legitimacy of abstract danger crimes, the present investigation aspires to identify some limits to its creation and interpretation, so that the rejection of the so-called nuclear or classic Criminal Law model is compatible with the requirements and the guarantees of a minimum Criminal Law program.
Matèries
Matèries (anglès)
Citació
Citació
BAGES SANTACANA, Joaquim. La tentativa en los delitos de peligro abstracto. [consulta: 25 de desembre de 2025]. [Disponible a: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/125133]