Bias in diet determination: Incorporating traditional methods in Bayesian mixing models

dc.contributor.authorFranco-Trecu, Valentina
dc.contributor.authorDrago, Massimiliano
dc.contributor.authorRiet-Sapriza, Federico G.
dc.contributor.authorParnell, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorFrau, Rosina
dc.contributor.authorInchausti, Pablo
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-07T11:59:21Z
dc.date.available2018-05-07T11:59:21Z
dc.date.issued2013-11-05
dc.date.updated2018-05-07T11:59:21Z
dc.description.abstractThere are not "universal methods" to determine diet composition of predators. Most traditional methods are biased because of their reliance on differential digestibility and the recovery of hard items. By relying on assimilated food, stable isotope and Bayesian mixing models (SIMMs) resolve many biases of traditional methods. SIMMs can incorporate prior information (i.e. proportional diet composition) that may improve the precision in the estimated dietary composition. However few studies have assessed the performance of traditional methods and SIMMs with and without informative priors to study the predators' diets. Here we compare the diet compositions of the South American fur seal and sea lions obtained by scats analysis and by SIMMs-UP (uninformative priors) and assess whether informative priors (SIMMs-IP) from the scat analysis improved the estimated diet composition compared to SIMMs-UP. According to the SIMM-UP, while pelagic species dominated the fur seal's diet the sea lion's did not have a clear dominance of any prey. In contrast, SIMM-IP's diets compositions were dominated by the same preys as in scat analyses. When prior information influenced SIMMs' estimates, incorporating informative priors improved the precision in the estimated diet composition at the risk of inducing biases in the estimates. If preys isotopic data allow discriminating preys' contributions to diets, informative priors should lead to more precise but unbiased estimated diet composition. Just as estimates of diet composition obtained from traditional methods are critically interpreted because of their biases, care must be exercised when interpreting diet composition obtained by SIMMs-IP. The best approach to obtain a near-complete view of predators' diet composition should involve the simultaneous consideration of different sources of partial evidence (traditional methods, SIMM-UP and SIMM-IP) in the light of natural history of the predator species so as to reliably ascertain and weight the information yielded by each method.
dc.format.extent8 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec671026
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.pmid24224031
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/122135
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science (PLoS)
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080019
dc.relation.ispartofPLoS One, 2013, vol. 8, num. 11, p. 1-8
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080019
dc.rightscc-by (c) Franco-Trecu, Valentina et al., 2013
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Biologia Evolutiva, Ecologia i Ciències Ambientals)
dc.subject.classificationDieta
dc.subject.classificationPredació (Biologia)
dc.subject.classificationEstadística bayesiana
dc.subject.otherDiet
dc.subject.otherPredation (Biology)
dc.subject.otherBayesian statistical decision
dc.titleBias in diet determination: Incorporating traditional methods in Bayesian mixing models
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
671026.pdf
Mida:
627.67 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format