Optimizing Instrumental Odour Monitoring Systems in Drones by Feature Selection for Odour Detection and Odour Concentration Estimation

dc.contributor.authorBenegiamo, Alessandro
dc.contributor.authorAlonso Valdesueiro, Javier
dc.contributor.authorBurgués, Javier
dc.contributor.authorVidal, Albert
dc.contributor.authorSaúco, Lidia
dc.contributor.authorEsclapez, María Deseada
dc.contributor.authorDoñate, Silvia
dc.contributor.authorGutiérrez Gálvez, Agustín
dc.contributor.authorMarco Colás, Santiago
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-08T12:30:18Z
dc.date.available2026-05-08T12:30:18Z
dc.date.issued2026-04-01
dc.date.updated2026-05-08T12:30:18Z
dc.description.abstractFugitive odour emissions from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) present ongoing analytical and environmental challenges. Drone-mounted Instrumental Odour Monitoring Systems (IOMS) enable real-time, spatially resolved chemical sensing; however, large sensor arrays increase calibration complexity and cost. To address this, IOMS optimization is formulated as a machine-learning feature-selection problem. A two-stage selection strategy is introduced, combining Sequential Forward Selection (SFS) and Interval Partial Least Squares (iPLS) regression to identify minimal, information-rich sensor subsets and optimal temporal measurement windows. The approach is evaluated using data from a hexacopter-borne IOMS equipped with 21 sensors operating over an active WWTP. Sensors are ranked according to their incremental contribution to odour-concentration prediction error reduction, followed by refinement of measurement intervals to capture relevant temporal dynamics. Validation on independent flight data demonstrates that a configuration comprising only three sensors with optimized time windows retains or improves predictive performance relative to the full array. For quantification, the Bland–Altman limits of agreement improve from ±7 to ±5.3 dBod, and the Pearson correlation increases from 0.80 to 0.89. For odour-detection task, a single sensor achieves an AUC of 0.95, slightly outperforming the full sensor set (AUC = 0.93). Bootstrap analysis reveals variability in feature selection, though consistent trends are observed: ammonia sensors dominate quantitative models, whereas low-temperature MOX sensors are preferred in detection. The findings demonstrate the effectiveness of feature-selection strategies in simplifying IOMS hardware while preserving chemometric performance.
dc.format.extent12 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec768994
dc.identifier.idimarina6760878
dc.identifier.issn0169-7439
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/229383
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2026.105716
dc.relation.ispartofChemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2026, vol. 274, num.2026, p. 1-12
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2026.105716
dc.rightscc-by-nc (c) Benegiamo, Alessandro et al., 2026
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Enginyeria Electrònica i Biomèdica)
dc.subject.classificationOlors
dc.subject.classificationQualitat de l'aire
dc.subject.classificationAprenentatge automàtic
dc.subject.classificationDrons
dc.subject.otherOdors
dc.subject.otherAir quality
dc.subject.otherMachine learning
dc.subject.otherDrone aircraft
dc.titleOptimizing Instrumental Odour Monitoring Systems in Drones by Feature Selection for Odour Detection and Odour Concentration Estimation
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
934559.pdf
Mida:
8.5 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format