A full year evaluation of the CALIOPE-EU air quality system in Europe for 2004: a model study

dc.contributor.authorPay Pérez, María Teresa
dc.contributor.authorPiot, M.
dc.contributor.authorJorba, O.
dc.contributor.authorBasart, S.
dc.contributor.authorGassó, S.
dc.contributor.authorJiménez-Guerrero, P.
dc.contributor.authorGonçalves, M.
dc.contributor.authorDabdub, D.
dc.contributor.authorBaldasano Recio, José M. (José María)
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-22T13:07:55Z
dc.date.available2016-02-22T13:07:55Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.date.updated2016-02-22T13:07:55Z
dc.description.abstractThe CALIOPE-EU high-resolution air quality modeling system, namely WRF-ARW/HERMES-EMEP/CMAQ/BSC-DREAM8b, is developed and applied to Europe (12 km × 12 km, 1 h). The model performances are tested in terms of air quality levels and dynamics reproducibility on a yearly basis. The present work describes a quantitative evaluation of gas phase species (O3, NO2 and SO2) and particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10) against ground-based measurements from the EMEP (European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme) network for the year 2004. The evaluation is based on statistics. Simulated O3 achieves satisfactory performances for both daily mean and daily maximum concentrations, especially in summer, with annual mean correlations of 0.66 and 0.69, respectively. Mean normalized errors are comprised within the recommendations proposed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US-EPA). The general trends and daily variations of primary pollutants (NO2 and SO2) are satisfactory. Daily mean concentrations of NO2 correlate well with observations (annual correlation r = 0.67) but tend to be underestimated. For SO2, mean concentrations are well simulated (mean bias = 0.5 μg m−3) with relatively high annual mean correlation (r = 0.60), although peaks are generally overestimated. The dynamics of PM2.5 and PM10 is well reproduced (0.49 < r < 0.62), but mean concentrations remain systematically underestimated. Deficiencies in particulate matter source characterization are discussed. Also, the spatially distributed statistics and the general patterns for each pollutant over Europe are examined. The model performances are compared with other European studies. While O3 statistics generally remain lower than those obtained by the other considered studies, statistics for NO2, SO2, PM2.5 and PM10 present higher scores than most models.
dc.format.extent21 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec656741
dc.identifier.issn1352-2310
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/69698
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd
dc.relation.isformatofVersió postprint del document publicat a: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.05.040
dc.relation.ispartofAtmospheric Environment, 2010, vol. 44, num. 27, p. 3322-3342
dc.relation.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.05.040
dc.rights(c) Elsevier Ltd, 2010
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Genètica, Microbiologia i Estadística)
dc.subject.classificationQualitat de l'aire
dc.subject.classificationQuímica atmosfèrica
dc.subject.classificationContaminació atmosfèrica
dc.subject.otherAir quality
dc.subject.otherAtmospheric chemistry
dc.subject.otherAtmospheric pollution
dc.titleA full year evaluation of the CALIOPE-EU air quality system in Europe for 2004: a model study
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
656741.pdf
Mida:
3.77 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format