Dades (Psicologia Clínica i Psicobiologia)
URI permanent per a aquesta col·leccióhttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/130533
Examinar
Enviaments recents
Mostrant 1 - 2 de 2
AltresStructural brain network of gifted children has more integrated and versatile topology (Raw Data)(2013) Solé Casals, Jordi; Serra y Grabulosa, Josep Ma.; Romero García, Rafael; Vilaseca, Gemma; Adan Puig, Ana; Vilaró, Núria; Bargalló Alabart, Núria; Bullmore, Edward T.DICOM Imatges MRI DATA All participants were examined on a 3T MRI scanner (Magnetom Trio Tim, Siemens Medical Systems, Germany) at the Centre de Diagnòstic per la Imatge in the Hospital Clínic of Barcelona. High-resolution T1-weighted images were acquired with the MPRAGE 3D protocol (TR=2300 ms; TE=3 ms; TI=900 ms; FOV=244x244 mm2; 1 mm isotropic voxel). - Control group: 01CO, 02CO, 03CO, 04CO, 05CO, 06CO, 07CO, 08CO, 09CO, 10CO, 11CO, 12CO, 14CO, 15CO. - Gifted group: 01AC, 02AC, 03AC, 04AC, 05AC, 06AC, 07AC, 08AC, 09AC, 10AC, 11AC, 12AC, 13AC, 14AC, 15AC. Cortical thickness data The cortical thickness matrices are: - rawCT_GG: data for the gifted group; contains the cortical thickness of the 308 regions (columns) for each individual subject (raws) in mm - rawCT_CG: data for the control group; contains the cortical thickness of the 308 regions (columns) for each individual subject (raws) in mm The structure of both matrices is [subjects x regions].- AltresSchool staff members knowledge of victimization, detection and reporting(2019-03-01) Greco, Ana Martina; Guilera Ferré, Georgina; Pereda Beltran, NoemíRaw data from the study “School staff members knowledge of victimization, detection and reporting”. The study is centered in analyzing the level of knowledge of school staff members of Barcelona city of victimization, its detection and its reporting. Knowledge in this areas is measured through thirty statements to classify as true or false. The statements are coded as follows: F1 to F10: Statements about victimization F11 to F20: Statements about detection F21 to F30: Statements about reporting Correctly classified statements are coded with “1” and wrongly classified or unknown statements were coded as “0”. The data also includes variables of interest, such as self-perceived efficacy to detect sign in minors (“Scm”), self-perceived efficacy to detect signs in families (“Scf”), if the participant ever had a suspicions that a child under their care might be being victimized (“Detec”) and if the participant ever reported a potential victimization case outside the school (“Repor”). All these variables are coded as “1” if they were answered positively and “0” if they were answered negatively. The dataset also includes demographic variables, coded as follows: Sex (“Sex”): “0” mean “female” and “1” mean “male”. Role in school (“Role”): The first category (“0”) referred school staff who spent four hours or more in charge of the same group of children or adolescents, mainly kindergarten and elementary school teachers. The second category (“1”) included school staff members who spent less than four hours per day with the same group of students, like teachers of specific courses such as art, music, physical education, lunchtime or playground monitors. The last category (“2”) comprised staff such as head teachers, special education teachers or school psychologists who were not in charge of groups of children or adolescents but encountered them individually. School level in which the participant was working (“Level”): First category (“0”) included staff working in kindergarten or elementary school, second category (“1”) grouped staff working in middle or high school and the third category (“2”) referred to staff working in both levels. Results showed lower levels of knowledge in the reporting sections and significant relationship with detection and reporting experiences.