A Diagnostic Accuracy Study of Targeted and Systematic Biopsies to Detect Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer, including a Model for the Partial Omission of Systematic Biopsies

dc.contributor.authorMorote, Juan
dc.contributor.authorPicola, Natàlia
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz Rodríguez, Jesús
dc.contributor.authorPaesano, Nahuel
dc.contributor.authorRuiz Plazas, Xavier
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz Rivero, Marta Viridiana
dc.contributor.authorCelma, Ana
dc.contributor.authorGarcía de Manuel, Gemma
dc.contributor.authorAisian, Ignacio
dc.contributor.authorServian, Pol
dc.contributor.authorAbascal Junquera, José Maria
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-26T19:49:03Z
dc.date.available2024-03-26T19:49:03Z
dc.date.issued2023-09-13
dc.date.updated2023-10-25T10:27:15Z
dc.description.abstractThe primary objective of this study was to analyse the current accuracy of targeted and systematic prostate biopsies in detecting csPCa. A secondary objective was to determine whether there are factors predicting the finding of csPCa in targeted biopsies and, if so, to explore the utility of a predictive model for csPCa detection only in targeted biopsies. We analysed 2122 men with suspected PCa, serum PSA > 3 ng/mL, and/or a suspicious digital rectal examination (DRE), who underwent targeted and systematic biopsies between 2021 and 2022. CsPCa (grade group 2 or higher) was detected in 1026 men (48.4%). Discrepancies in csPCa detection in targeted and systematic biopsies were observed in 49.6%, with 13.9% of csPCa cases being detected only in systematic biopsies and 35.7% only in targeted biopsies. A predictive model for csPCa detection only in targeted biopsies was developed from the independent predictors age (years), prostate volume (mL), PI-RADS score (3 to 5), mpMRI Tesla (1.5 vs. 3.0), TRUS-MRI fusion image technique (cognitive vs. software), and prostate biopsy route (transrectal vs. transperineal). The csPCa discrimination ability of targeted biopsies showed an AUC of 0.741 (95% CI 0.721-0.762). The avoidance rate of systematic prostate biopsies went from 0.5% without missing csPCa to 18.3% missing 4.6% of csPCa cases. We conclude that the csPCa diagnostic accuracy of targeted biopsies is higher than that of systematic biopsies. However, a significant rate of csPCa remains detected only in systematic biopsies. A predictive model for the partial omission of systematic biopsies was developed.
dc.format.extent12 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.issn2072-6694
dc.identifier.pmid37760511
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/209248
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherMDPI AG
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15184543
dc.relation.ispartofCancers, 2023, vol. 15, num. 18
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15184543
dc.rightscc by (c) Morote, Juan et al., 2023
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))
dc.subject.classificationCàncer de pròstata
dc.subject.classificationBiòpsia
dc.subject.otherProstate cancer
dc.subject.otherBiopsy
dc.titleA Diagnostic Accuracy Study of Targeted and Systematic Biopsies to Detect Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer, including a Model for the Partial Omission of Systematic Biopsies
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
cancers-15-04543.pdf
Mida:
597.47 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format