A randomized clinical trial for the timing of tracheotomy in critically ill patients: factors precluding inclusion in a single center study

dc.contributor.authorDíaz Prieto, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorMateu, Antoni
dc.contributor.authorGorriz, Maite
dc.contributor.authorOrtiga, Berta
dc.contributor.authorTruchero, Consol
dc.contributor.authorSampietro, Neus
dc.contributor.authorFerrer, María Jesus
dc.contributor.authorMáñez Mendiluce, Rafael
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-22T14:24:38Z
dc.date.available2018-11-22T14:24:38Z
dc.date.issued2014-10-29
dc.date.updated2018-07-24T12:42:36Z
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: We investigated the potential benefits of early tracheotomy performed before day eight of mechanical ventilation (MV) compared with late tracheotomy (from day 14 if it still indicated) in reducing mortality, days of MV, days of sedation and ICU length of stay (LOS). Methods: Randomized controlled trial (RCT) including all-consecutive ICU admitted patients requiring seven or more days of MV. Between days five to seven of MV, before randomization, the attending physician (AP) was consulted about the expected duration of MV and acceptance of tracheotomy according to randomization. Only accepted patients received tracheotomy as result of randomization. An intention to treat analysis was performed including patients accepted for the AP and those rejected without exclusion criteria. Results: A total of 489 patients were included in the RCT. Of 245 patients randomized to the early group, the procedure was performed for 167 patients (68.2%) whereas in the 244 patients randomized to the late group was performed for 135 patients (55.3%) (P <0.004). Mortality at day 90 was similar in both groups (25.7% versus 29.9%), but duration of sedation was shorter in the early tracheotomy group median 11 days (range 2 to 92) days compared to 14 days (range 0 to 79) in the late group (P <0.02). The AP accepted the protocol of randomization in 205 cases (42%), 101 were included in early group and 104 in the late group. In these subgroup of patients (per-protocol analysis) no differences existed in mortality at day 90 between the two groups, but the early group had more ventilator-free days, less duration of sedation and less LOS, than the late group. Conclusions: This study shows that early tracheotomy reduces the days of sedation in patients undergoing MV, but was underpowered to prove any other benefit. In those patients selected by their attending physicians as potential candidates for a tracheotomy, an early procedure can lessen the days of MV, the days of sedation and LOS. However, the imprecision of physicians to select patients who will require prolonged MV challenges the potential benefits of early tracheotomy.
dc.format.extent11 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.pmid25358451
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/126357
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBioMed Central
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-014-0585-y
dc.relation.ispartofCritical Care, 2014, vol. 18, num. 5
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-014-0585-y
dc.rightscc by (c) Díaz Prieto et al., 2014
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))
dc.subject.classificationTraqueotomia
dc.subject.classificationRespiració artificial
dc.subject.otherTracheotomy
dc.subject.otherArtificial respiration
dc.titleA randomized clinical trial for the timing of tracheotomy in critically ill patients: factors precluding inclusion in a single center study
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
Diaz-PrietoA.pdf
Mida:
300.92 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format