Development of a Composite Score for the Clinical Assessment of Anti-IgLON5 Disease

Abstract

Background and objectives: To develop a composite score to assess the severity of the multiple symptoms present in anti-IgLON5 disease. Methods: The anti-IgLON5 disease composite score (ICS) was designed to evaluate 17 symptoms divided into 5 clinical domains (bulbar, sleep, movement disorders, cognition, and others). Each symptom was scored from 0 (absent/normal) to 3 or 6 (severe) depending on the contribution of the symptom to neurologic disability with a maximum ICS of 69. The ICS was tested in patients from 2 cohorts (Barcelona, Spain, and GENERATE, Germany) that included cases personally seen by the authors (internal) and patients whose ICS was obtained from information of questionnaires completed by the referring neurologists (external). Test-retest and interrater reliabilities of the ICS were assessed by the intraclass coefficient (ICC) and the correlation between the ICS and modified Rankin scale (mRS) with the nonparametric Spearman rank coefficient. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare the ICS at diagnosis of anti-IgLON5 disease and follow-up in a subset of patients with available clinical information. Results: A total of 86 patients (46 from Barcelona cohort; 40 from GENERATE cohort) were included. The median ICS was 15 (range 2-31). The ICS was higher in the Barcelona cohort than in the German cohort (18 vs 12, p < 0.001), due to higher partial scores in sleep and movement disorder domains. There were no significant differences in the ICS between internal and external patients (15 vs 14, p = 0.96). The ICS correlated with the mRS score (r = 0.429, p < 0.001). Test-retest and interrater reliabilities were excellent with an ICC of 0.997 (95% CI 0.992-0.999) and 0.973 (95% CI 0.925-0.990), respectively. ICS was retested during follow-up in 27 patients, and it was similar to that at diagnosis in 10 clinically stable patients (median ICS at diagnosis 11.5 vs 11.5 at follow-up; p = 1), higher in 8 patients who worsened (12.5 vs 18; p = 0.012), and lower in 9 patients who improved after immunotherapy (14 vs 10; p = 0.007). Discussion: The ICS is a valid method to assess the extension and severity of the different clinical manifestations of anti-IgLON5 disease.