Document type
Working paperPublication date
Publication license
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/116985
Plurality versus proportional electoral rule: which is most representative of voters?
Journal Title
Authors
Director/Tutor
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Related resource
Abstract
This study compares the representativeness of voters in the proportional electoral system with the situation under plurality rule. Representativeness is commonly measured by comparing parties’ received votes with their shares of seats in the Parliament; this implies that proportional rule should always better represent voters. A coalition within the Parliament, however, rules the country without interference and supports the government; when a coalition is formed, the pivotal role of small parties and the proposal right of the formateur can significantly impact the distribution of power. Focusing on the coalition formation stage, I demonstrate that the proportional rule is more representative only under very specific conditions. If these conditions are not met, introducing some distortions in the distribution of seats among parties can actually improve representativeness.
Subject (English)
Citation
Citation
PIOLATTO, Amedeo. Plurality versus proportional electoral rule: which is most representative of voters?. IEB Working Paper 2009/27. [consulted: 14 of June of 2026]. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/116985