Multiplex real-time PCR in non-invasive respiratory samples to reduce antibiotic use in community-acquired pneumonia: a randomised trial

dc.contributor.authorAbelenda Alonso, Gabriela
dc.contributor.authorCalatayud, Laura
dc.contributor.authorRombauts, Alexander
dc.contributor.authorMeije, Yolanda
dc.contributor.authorOriol, Isabel
dc.contributor.authorSopena, Nieves
dc.contributor.authorPadullés Zamora, Ariadna
dc.contributor.authorNiubó, Jordi
dc.contributor.authorDuarte, Alejandra
dc.contributor.authorLlaberia Marcual, Jaume
dc.contributor.authorAranda, Judit
dc.contributor.authorGudiol González, Carlota
dc.contributor.authorSatorra Herbera, Pau
dc.contributor.authorTebé, Cristian
dc.contributor.authorArdanuy Tisaire, María Carmen
dc.contributor.authorCarratalà, Jordi
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-18T16:29:18Z
dc.date.available2024-10-18T16:29:18Z
dc.date.issued2024-12-01
dc.date.updated2024-10-18T16:29:18Z
dc.description.abstractWe assessed whether multiplex real-time PCR plus conventional microbiological testing is safe and more effective than conventional microbiological testing alone for reducing antibiotic use in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). In this randomised trial, we recruited adults hospitalised with CAP at four Spanish hospitals. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to undergo either multiplex real-time PCR in non-invasive respiratory samples plus conventional microbiological testing or conventional microbiological testing alone. The primary endpoint was antibiotic use measured by days of antibiotic therapy (DOT). Between February 20, 2020, and April 24, 2023, 242 patients were enrolled; 119 were randomly assigned to multiplex real-time PCR plus conventional microbiological testing and 123 to conventional microbiological testing alone. All but one of the patients allocated to multiplex real-time PCR plus conventional microbiological testing underwent PCR, which was performed in sputum samples in 77 patients (65.2%) and in nasopharyngeal swabs in 41 (34.7%). The median DOT was 10.04 (IQR 7.98, 12.94) in the multiplex PCR plus conventional microbiological testing group and 11.33 (IQR 8.15, 16.16) in the conventional microbiological testing alone group (difference -1.04; 95% CI, -2.42 to 0.17; p = 0.093). No differences were observed in adverse events and 30-day mortality. Our findings do not support the routine implementation of multiplex real-time PCR in the initial microbiological testing in hospitalised patients with CAP.
dc.format.extent10 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec750865
dc.identifier.issn2041-1723
dc.identifier.pmid39154071
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/215891
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherNature Publishing Group
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-51547-8
dc.relation.ispartofNature Communications, 2024, vol. 15, num.1
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-51547-8
dc.rightscc-by (c) Abelenda-Alonso, G. et al., 2024
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Ciències Clíniques)
dc.subject.classificationPneumònia
dc.subject.classificationAntibiòtics
dc.subject.classificationMedicaments antibacterians
dc.subject.classificationInfeccions
dc.subject.otherPneumonia
dc.subject.otherAntibiotics
dc.subject.otherAntibacterial agents
dc.subject.otherInfections
dc.titleMultiplex real-time PCR in non-invasive respiratory samples to reduce antibiotic use in community-acquired pneumonia: a randomised trial
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
868071.pdf
Mida:
1.02 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format