Belief Revision, Uniqueness and the Equal Weight View

dc.contributor.authorPalmira, Michele
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-30T11:18:47Z
dc.date.available2020-03-30T11:18:47Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.date.updated2020-03-30T11:18:47Z
dc.description.abstractThomas Kelly has argued that the Equal Weight View of peer disagreement is committed both to belief revision and to the Uniqueness Thesis, which claims that for any hypothesis H and a total body of evidence e, there is some one-doxastic attitude that is uniquely rational to adopt towards H. I rebut both theses and I also defend the view that in Kelly's case the Uniqueness Thesis doesn't require belief revision.
dc.format.extent2 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec686358
dc.identifier.issn1757-0522
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/154368
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherUniversity of Kent
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://research.kent.ac.uk/reasoning/wp-content/uploads/sites/581/2019/06/TheReasoner-71-screen.pdf
dc.relation.ispartofThe Reasoner, 2013, vol. 7, num. 1, p. 4-5
dc.rights(c) Palmira, Michele, 2013
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Filosofia)
dc.subject.classificationTeoria del coneixement
dc.subject.classificationCreença i dubte
dc.subject.otherTheory of knowledge
dc.subject.otherBelief and doubt
dc.titleBelief Revision, Uniqueness and the Equal Weight View
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
686358.pdf
Mida:
94.07 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format