Document type
ArticleVersion
Published versionPublication date
Publication license
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/121364
Sexual Orientation as Interpretation? Sexual Desires, Concepts, and Choice
Journal Title
Authors
Director/Tutor
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Related resource
Abstract
Are sexual orientations freely chosen? The idea that someone's sexual orientation is not a choice is very influential in the mainstream LGBT political movement. But do we have good reasons to believe it is not a choice? Going against the orthodoxy, William Wilkerson has recently argued that sexual orientation is partly constituted by our interpretations of our own sexual desires, and we choose these interpretations, so sexual orientation is partly constituted by choice. In this paper I aim to examine the question of whether our interpretations of our own sexual desires are constitutive of our sexual orientations. I will argue that whereas Wilkerson's argument for the claim that sexual orientations are in part constituted by our chosen interpretations of our sexual desires is not sound, there are good reasons for endorsing a weaker claim, namely, that there are different but equally apt descriptions of the same sexual desires, depending on which concepts we have.
Subject
Subject (English)
Citation
Citation
DÍAZ LEÓN, Encarnación. Sexual Orientation as Interpretation? Sexual Desires, Concepts, and Choice. Journal of Social Ontology. 2017. Vol. 3, num. 2, pags. 231-248. ISSN 2196-9663. [consulted: 18 of August of 2026]. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/121364