Document type

Article

Version

Published version

Publication date

Publication license

cc by-nc-nd (c) Low, Sock Ching et al, 2021
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/182958

Complementary interactions between classical and top-down driven inhibitory mechanisms of attention

Journal Title

Director/Tutor

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Abstract

© 2020 The Authors Selective attention informs decision-making by biasing perceptual processing towards task-relevant stimuli. In experimental and computational literature, this is most often implemented through top-down excitation of selected stimuli. However, physiological and anatomical evidence shows that in certain situations, top-down signals could instead be inhibitory. In this study, we investigated how such an inhibitory mechanism of top-down attention compares with an excitatory one. We did so in a neurorobotics context where the agent was controlled using an established hierarchical architecture. We augmented the architecture with an attentional system that implemented top-down attention biasing as connection gains. We tested four models of top-down attention on the simulated agent performing a foraging task: without top-down biasing, with only excitatory top-down gain, with only inhibitory top-down gain, and with both excitatory and inhibitory top-down gain. We manipulated the reward-distractor ratio that was presented and assessed the agent's performance using accumulated rewards and the latency of the selection. Using these measures, we provide evidence that excitatory and inhibitory mechanisms of attention complement each other.

Citation

Citation

VOULOUTSI, Vicky, VERSCHURE, Paul and LOW, Sock Ching. Complementary interactions between classical and top-down driven inhibitory mechanisms of attention. Cognitive Systems Research. 2021. Vol.  vol 67, num. 66-72. ISSN 1389-0417. [consulted: 9 of June of 2026]. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/182958

Export metadata

JSON - METS

Share record