A Collaborative Effort to Define Classification Criteria for ATM Variants in Hereditary Cancer Patients

dc.contributor.authorFeliubadaló i Elorza, Maria Lídia
dc.contributor.authorMoles Fernández, Alejandro
dc.contributor.authorSantamariña-Pena, Marta
dc.contributor.authorSánchez, Alysson T.
dc.contributor.authorLópez Novo, Anael
dc.contributor.authorPorras, Luz Marina
dc.contributor.authorBlanco, Ana
dc.contributor.authorCapellá, G. (Gabriel)
dc.contributor.authorHoya, Miguel de la
dc.contributor.authorMolina, Ignacio J.
dc.contributor.authorOsorio, Ana
dc.contributor.authorPineda Riu, Marta
dc.contributor.authorRueda, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorCruz, Xavier de la
dc.contributor.authorDiez, Orland
dc.contributor.authorRuiz Ponte, Clara
dc.contributor.authorGutiérrez Enríquez, Sara
dc.contributor.authorVega, Ana
dc.contributor.authorLázaro García, Conxi
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-13T11:10:47Z
dc.date.available2021-12-06T06:10:20Z
dc.date.issued2020-12-06
dc.date.updated2021-04-13T11:10:47Z
dc.description.abstractBackground: Gene panel testing by massive parallel sequencing has increased the diagnostic yield but also the number of variants of uncertain significance. Clinical interpretation of genomic data requires expertise for each gene and disease. Heterozygous ATM pathogenic variants increase the risk of cancer, particularly breast cancer. For this reason, ATM is included in most hereditary cancer panels. It is a large gene, showing a high number of variants, most of them of uncertain significance. Hence, we initiated a collaborative effort to improve and standardize variant classification for the ATM gene. Methods: Six independent laboratories collected information from 766 ATM variant carriers harboring 283 different variants. Data were submitted in a consensus template form, variant nomenclature and clinical information were curated, and monthly team conferences were established to review and adapt American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG/AMP) criteria to ATM, which were used to classify 50 representative variants. Results: Amid 283 different variants, 99 appeared more than once, 35 had differences in classification among laboratories. Refinement of ACMG/AMP criteria to ATM involved specification for twenty-one criteria and adjustment of strength for fourteen others. Afterwards, 50 variants carried by 254 index cases were classified with the established framework resulting in a consensus classification for all of them and a reduction in the number of variants of uncertain significance from 58% to 42%. Conclusions: Our results highlight the relevance of data sharing and data curation by multidisciplinary experts to achieve improved variant classification that will eventually improve clinical management.
dc.format.extent16 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec706834
dc.identifier.issn1434-6621
dc.identifier.pmid33280026
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/176267
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWalter de Gruyter
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaa250
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 2020, vol. 67, num. 3, p. 518-533
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaa250
dc.rights(c) Walter de Gruyter, 2020
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Ciències Clíniques)
dc.subject.classificationMalalts de càncer
dc.subject.classificationEspanya
dc.subject.classificationCuració de dades
dc.subject.classificationMalalties hereditàries
dc.subject.otherCancer patients
dc.subject.otherSpain
dc.subject.otherData curation
dc.subject.otherGenetic diseases
dc.titleA Collaborative Effort to Define Classification Criteria for ATM Variants in Hereditary Cancer Patients
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
706834.pdf
Mida:
504.96 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format