Document type

Article

Version

Accepted version

Publication date

All rights reserved

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/217038

Inferior Vena Cava Filters: Adherence to Clinical Practice Guidelines Recommendations Retrieval Rates and Filter Complications in a Tertiary Hospital

Journal Title

Director/Tutor

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Abstract

The present study evaluated the adherence to guideline recommendations regarding the indication for inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) placement, retrieval rates, complications, thrombotic recurrences, and mortality. Patients in whom an IVCF was placed between 2015 and 2020 in a tertiary hospital were retrospectively included. We considered absolute indication of IVCF placement if all the guidelines evaluated agreed on the indication, relative indication if only some guidelines recommended it and without indication if none of the evaluated guidelines recommended it. From the 185 patients included; 47% had an absolute indication, 15% a relative indication, and 38% had no indication. Filter-associated complications and non-removal rates were 12.4% and 41%, respectively. Venous thromboembolism recurrence rate was 17.8%, being filter-associated complications (24.2 vs 9.8%, P = .02) and thrombosis of the inferior cava or iliac veins (12.1 vs 2.6%, P = .03) more frequent in this group. The mortality rate was 40%, with higher mortality risk in patients with co-existing cancer. Previous major bleeding, filter-associated complications, and mortality were associated with a major risk of non-removal. In conclusion, the adherence to guidelines regarding the indication of IVCF placement is still low and IVCF complications are not negligible. This fact is of special concern in the elderly, comorbid, and cancer patients.

Citation

Citation

GABARA XANCÓ, Cristina, et al. Inferior Vena Cava Filters: Adherence to Clinical Practice Guidelines Recommendations Retrieval Rates and Filter Complications in a Tertiary Hospital. Angiology. 2023. Vol. 75, num. 10, pags. 928-936. ISSN 0003-3197. [consulted: 14 of June of 2026]. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/217038

Export metadata

JSON - METS

Share record