Students' satisfaction and perceived impact on knowledge, attitudes and skills after a 2-day course in scientific writing: a prospective longitudinal study in Spain

dc.contributor.authorFernández Muñoz, Esteve
dc.contributor.authorGarcía, Ana M.
dc.contributor.authorSerés, Elisabet
dc.contributor.authorBosch, Fèlix
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-27T12:24:17Z
dc.date.available2018-08-27T12:24:17Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-27
dc.date.updated2018-08-27T12:24:18Z
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine students' satisfaction with a 2-day course on scientific writing in health sciences and to assess their perceptions of the long-term impact on their knowledge, attitudes and skills. SETTING: 27 iterations of a 2-day course on writing and publishing scientific articles in health sciences. PARTICIPANTS: 741 students attending the 27 courses. DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal study. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Immediately after each course, students completed a first questionnaire, rating their satisfaction with different aspects of the classroom sessions on a Likert scale (0-5). Approximately 2 years after the course, students completed a follow-up questionnaire, using a Likert scale (0-4) to rate their knowledge, skills and attitudes in relation to scientific writing before and after attending the course. RESULTS: 741 students (70% women) participated in the 27 iterations of the course; 568 (76.8%) completed the first questionnaire and 182 (24.6%) completed the follow-up questionnaire. The first questionnaire reflected high overall satisfaction (mean score, 4.6). In the second questionnaire, students reported that the course had improved their knowledge (mean improvement: 1.6; 95% CI 1.6 to 1.7), attitudes (mean improvement: 1.3; 95% CI 1.2 to 1.4) and skills (mean improvement: 1.4; 95% CI 1.3 to 1.4) related to writing and publishing scientific papers. Most respondents (n=145, 79.7%) had participated in drafting a scientific paper after the course; in this subgroup, all the specific writing skills assessed in the second questionnaire significantly improved. CONCLUSIONS: Students were satisfied with the format and the contents of the course, and those who responded to the follow-up survey considered that the course had improved their knowledge, attitudes and skills in relation to scientific writing and publishing. Courses are particularly important in countries without strong traditions in scientific publication.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec679500
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
dc.identifier.pmid29374664
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/124145
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Group
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018657
dc.relation.ispartofBMJ Open, 2018, vol. 8, num. 1, p. e018657
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018657
dc.rightscc-by (c) Fernández, Esteve et al., 2018
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Ciències Clíniques)
dc.subject.classificationCiències de la salut
dc.subject.classificationEstudiants universitaris
dc.subject.otherMedical sciences
dc.subject.otherCollege students
dc.titleStudents' satisfaction and perceived impact on knowledge, attitudes and skills after a 2-day course in scientific writing: a prospective longitudinal study in Spain
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
679500.pdf
Mida:
769.11 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format