Extramedullary disease in multiple myeloma: a systematic literature review

dc.contributor.authorBlade, Joan
dc.contributor.authorBeksac, Meral
dc.contributor.authorCaers, Jo
dc.contributor.authorJurczyszyn, Artur
dc.contributor.authorLilienfeld Toal, Marie von
dc.contributor.authorMoreau, Philippe
dc.contributor.authorRasche, Leo
dc.contributor.authorRosiñol Dachs, Laura
dc.contributor.authorUsmani, Saad Z.
dc.contributor.authorZamagni, Elena
dc.contributor.authorRichardson, Paul G.
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-29T19:20:33Z
dc.date.available2024-01-29T19:20:33Z
dc.date.issued2022-05-21
dc.date.updated2023-06-22T10:18:54Z
dc.description.abstractExtramedullary involvement (or extramedullary disease, EMD) represents an aggressive form of multiple myeloma (MM), characterized by the ability of a clone and/or subclone to thrive and grow independent of the bone marrow microenvironment. Several different definitions of EMD have been used in the published literature. We advocate that true EMD is restricted to soft-tissue plasmacytomas that arise due to hematogenous spread and have no contact with bony structures. Typical sites of EMD vary according to the phase of MM. At diagnosis, EMD is typically found in skin and soft tissues; at relapse, typical sites involved include liver, kidneys, lymph nodes, central nervous system (CNS), breast, pleura, and pericardium. The reported incidence of EMD varies considerably, and differences in diagnostic approach between studies are likely to contribute to this variability. In patients with newly diagnosed MM, the reported incidence ranges from 0.5% to 4.8%, while in relapsed/refractory MM the reported incidence is 3.4 to 14%. Available data demonstrate that the prognosis is poor, and considerably worse than for MM without soft-tissue plasmacytomas. Among patients with plasmacytomas, those with EMD have poorer outcomes than those with paraskeletal involvement. CNS involvement is rare, but prognosis is even more dismal than for EMD in other locations, particularly if there is leptomeningeal involvement. Available data on treatment outcomes for EMD are derived almost entirely from retrospective studies. Some agents and combinations have shown a degree of efficacy but, as would be expected, this is less than in MM patients with no extramedullary involvement. The paucity of prospective studies makes it difficult to justify strong recommendations for any treatment approach. Prospective data from patients with clearly defined EMD are important for the optimal evaluation of treatment outcomes.© 2022. The Author(s).
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idimarina9300942
dc.identifier.issn2044-5385
dc.identifier.pmid35314675
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/206621
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer Nature
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-022-00643-3
dc.relation.ispartofBlood Cancer Journal, 2022, vol. 12, num. 3, p. 45
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41408-022-00643-3
dc.rightscc by (c) Blade, J. et al., 2022
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (IDIBAPS: Institut d'investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer)
dc.subject.classificationMieloma múltiple
dc.subject.classificationTumors
dc.subject.otherMultiple myeloma
dc.subject.otherTumors
dc.titleExtramedullary disease in multiple myeloma: a systematic literature review
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
Extramedullary disease in multiple myeloma a systematic_BloodCancer.pdf
Mida:
726.13 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format