Carregant...
Fitxers
Tipus de document
ArticleVersió
Versió publicadaData de publicació
Llicència de publicació
Si us plau utilitzeu sempre aquest identificador per citar o enllaçar aquest document: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/174124
Cost-effectiveness of Different Strategies for Screening and Treatment of Strongyloides stercoralis in Migrants From Endemic Countries to the European Union
Títol de la revista
Director/Tutor
ISSN de la revista
Títol del volum
Recurs relacionat
Resum
Background: The best strategy for controlling morbidity due to imported strongyloidiasis in migrants is unclear. We evaluate the cost-effectiveness of six possible interventions. Methods: We developed a stochastic Markov chain model. The target population was adult migrants from endemic countries to the European Union; the time horizon, a lifetime and the perspective, that of the health system. Average and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ACER and ICER) were calculated as 2016 EUR/life-year gained (LYG). Health interventions compared were: base case (no programme), primary care-based presumptive treatment (PCPresTr), primary care-based serological screening and treatment (PCSerTr), hospital-based presumptive treatment (HospPresTr), hospital-based serological screening and treatment (HospSerTr), hospital-based presumptive treatment of immunosuppressed (HospPresTrim) and hospital-based serological screening and treatment of the immunosuppressed (HospSerTrim). The willingness to pay threshold (WTP) was ¿32 126.95/LYG. Results: The base case model yielded a loss of 2 486 708.24 life-years and cost EUR 3 238 393. Other interventions showed the following: PCPresTr: 2 488 095.47 life-years (Δ1 387.23LYG), cost: EUR 8 194 563; ACER: EUR 3573/LYG; PCSerTr: 2 488 085.8 life-years (Δ1377.57LYG), cost: EUR 207 679 077, ACER: EUR 148 407/LYG; HospPresTr: 2 488 046.17 life-years (Δ1337.92LYG), cost: EUR 14 559 575; ACER: EUR 8462/LYG; HospSerTr: 2 488 024.33 life-years (Δ1316.08LYG); cost: EUR 207 734 073; ACER: EUR 155 382/LYG; HospPresTrim: 2 488 093.93 life-years, cost: EUR 1 105 483; ACER: EUR -1539/LYG (cost savings); HospSerTrim: 2 488 073.8 life-years (Δ1365.55LYG), cost: EUR 4 274 239; ACER: EUR 759/LYG. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were undertaken; HospPresTrim remained below WTP for all parameters' ranges and iterations. Conclusion: Presumptively treating all immunosuppressed migrants from areas with endemic Strongyloides would generate cost savings to the health system.
Matèries (anglès)
Citació
Citació
WIKMAN JORGENSEN, Philip erick, LLENAS GARCÍA, Jara, SHEDRAWY, Jad, GASCÓN I BRUSTENGA, Joaquim, MUÑOZ GUTIÉRREZ, José, BISOFFI, Zeno, REQUENA-MÉNDEZ, Ana. Cost-effectiveness of Different Strategies for Screening and Treatment of Strongyloides stercoralis in Migrants From Endemic Countries to the European Union. _BMJ Global Health_. 2020. Vol. 5(5), núm. e002321. [consulta: 24 de gener de 2026]. ISSN: 2059-7908. [Disponible a: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/174124]