Soft-Tissue-Mimicking Using Hydrogels for the Development of Phantoms

dc.contributor.authorTejo Otero, Aitor
dc.contributor.authorFenollosa Artés, Felip
dc.contributor.authorAchaerandio, Isabel
dc.contributor.authorRey Vinolas, Sergi
dc.contributor.authorBuj Corral, Irene
dc.contributor.authorMateos Timoneda, Miguel Ángel
dc.contributor.authorEngel, Elisabeth
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-11T09:09:00Z
dc.date.available2022-05-11T09:09:00Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-06
dc.date.updated2022-05-10T08:13:05Z
dc.description.abstractWith the currently available materials and technologies it is difficult to mimic the mechanical properties of soft living tissues. Additionally, another significant problem is the lack of information about the mechanical properties of these tissues. Alternatively, the use of phantoms offers a promising solution to simulate biological bodies. For this reason, to advance in the state-of-the-art a wide range of organs (e.g., liver, heart, kidney as well as brain) and hydrogels (e.g., agarose, polyvinyl alcohol –PVA–, Phytagel –PHY– and methacrylate gelatine –GelMA–) were tested regarding their mechanical properties. For that, viscoelastic behavior, hardness, as well as a non-linear elastic mechanical response were measured. It was seen that there was a significant difference among the results for the different mentioned soft tissues. Some of them appear to be more elastic than viscous as well as being softer or harder. With all this information in mind, a correlation between the mechanical properties of the organs and the different materials was performed. The next conclusions were drawn: (1) to mimic the liver, the best material is 1% wt agarose; (2) to mimic the heart, the best material is 2% wt agarose; (3) to mimic the kidney, the best material is 4% wt GelMA; and (4) to mimic the brain, the best materials are 4% wt GelMA and 1% wt agarose. Neither PVA nor PHY was selected to mimic any of the studied tissues.
dc.format.extent14 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idimarina6545107
dc.identifier.issn2310-2861
dc.identifier.pmid35049575
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/185508
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3390/gels8010040
dc.relation.ispartofGels, 2022, vol.8, num. 1, p. 40
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/gels8010040
dc.rightscc by (c) Tejo Otero, Aitor et al., 2022
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Institut de Bioenginyeria de Catalunya (IBEC))
dc.subject.classificationEnginyeria de teixits
dc.subject.classificationGels (Farmàcia)
dc.subject.classificationViscoelasticitat
dc.subject.otherTissue engineering
dc.subject.otherGels (Pharmacy)
dc.subject.otherViscoelasticity
dc.titleSoft-Tissue-Mimicking Using Hydrogels for the Development of Phantoms
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
2022_Gels_SoftTissue_EngelE.pdf
Mida:
3.05 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format