Files
Document type
ArticleVersion
Accepted versionPublication date
All rights reserved
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/141108
Allele balance bias identifies systematic genotyping errors and false disease associations
Journal Title
Director/Tutor
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Related resource
Abstract
In recent years, next‐generation sequencing (NGS) has become a cornerstone of clinical genetics and diagnostics. Many clinical applications require high precision, especially if rare events such as somatic mutations in cancer or genetic variants causing rare diseases need to be identified. Although random sequencing errors can be modeled statistically and deep sequencing minimizes their impact, systematic errors remain a problem even at high depth of coverage. Understanding their source is crucial to increase precision of clinical NGS applications. In this work, we studied the relation between recurrent biases in allele balance (AB), systematic errors, and false positive variant calls across a large cohort of human samples analyzed by whole exome sequencing (WES). We have modeled the AB distribution for biallelic genotypes in 987 WES samples in order to identify positions recurrently deviating significantly from the expectation, a phenomenon we termed allele balance bias (ABB). Furthermore, we have developed a genotype callability score based on ABB for all positions of the human exome, which detects false positive variant calls that passed state‐of‐the‐art filters. Finally, we demonstrate the use of ABB for detection of false associations proposed by rare variant association studies. Availability: https://github.com/Francesc-Muyas/ABB.
Subject
Subject (English)
Citation
Citation
MUYAS, Francesc, et al. Allele balance bias identifies systematic genotyping errors and false disease associations. Human Mutation. 2018. Vol. 40, num. 1, pags. 115-116. ISSN 1059-7794. [consulted: 19 of August of 2026]. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/141108