Document type

Working paper

Publication date

Publication license

cc-by-nc-nd, (c) Buzzacchi et al., 2009
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/116978

Optimal risk allocation in the provision of local public services: can a private insurer be better than a public mutual fund?

Journal Title

Director/Tutor

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Related resource

Abstract

In this paper we consider the institutional arrangements needed in a decentralised framework to cope with the potential adverse welfare effects caused by localized negative shocks, that impact on the provision of public services and that can be limited by precautionary investments. We model the role of a public mutual fund to cover these “collective risks”. We first study the under-investment problem stemming from the moral hazard of Local administrations, when investments are defined at the local level and are not observable by the Central government that manages the mutual fund. We then examine the potential role of private insurers in solving the underinvestment problem. Our analysis shows that the public fund is almost always superior to the private insurance solution.

Citation

Citation

BUZZACCHI, Luigi and TURATI, Gilberto. Optimal risk allocation in the provision of local public services: can a private insurer be better than a public mutual fund?. IEB Working Paper 2009/21. [consulted: 18 of June of 2026]. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/116978

Export metadata

JSON - METS

Share record