Comparative Study of Refraction between Wave Front-Based Refraction and Autorefraction without and with Cycloplegia in Children and Adolescents

dc.contributor.authorCalvo Maroto, Ana M.
dc.contributor.authorLlorente González, Sara
dc.contributor.authorBezunartea bezunartea, Jaione
dc.contributor.authorHurtado Ceña, Francisco Javier
dc.contributor.authorBerrozpe Villabona, Clara
dc.contributor.authorBilbao Malavé, Valentina
dc.contributor.authorPiñero, David P.
dc.contributor.authorBarrio Barrio, Jesús
dc.contributor.authorRecalde Maestre, Sergio
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-11T16:36:16Z
dc.date.available2022-02-11T16:36:16Z
dc.date.issued2022-01-09
dc.date.updated2022-02-11T10:27:30Z
dc.description.abstractThe main aim of this study was to compare refraction measurements with and without cycloplegia from two refractors devices, (TRK-2P autorefractometer (TRK-2P) and wavefront-based refraction Visionix 130 (VX130)) in children and adolescents. This descriptive observational study included 20 myopic eyes and 40 hyperopic eyes measured in two different Spanish hospitals. Cycloplegia was carried out by three drops of cyclopentolate hydrochloride 1% (Colircusi cycloplegic, Alcon Healthcare S.A., Barcelona). The mean age of the myopia group was 12.40 +/- 3.48 years; for the hyperopia group, the mean age was 7.37 +/- 2.47 years. In the myopia group, autorefraction and wavefront-based refraction did not show clinically significant differences in any components between with and without cycloplegia. The hyperopia group showed statistical and clinically significant differences in sphere and SE components between relaxed and non-relaxed states of accommodation, although the cylindrical components were not clinically different. In this study, we considered a value of >= 0.50D as a clinically significant difference in refraction. Therefore, both devices were capable of obtaining accurate refractions without cyclopegia in myopia children, although they did not avoid instrument myopia and accommodation involved in hyperopia children. Moreover, both refractometers could be useful for astigmatism monitoring in children without the need for cycloplegic drops.
dc.format.extent11 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.issn2227-9067
dc.identifier.pmid35053713
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/183117
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherMDPI AG
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3390/children9010088
dc.relation.ispartofChildren, 2022, vol 9, num 1
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/children9010088
dc.rightscc by (c) Calvo Maroto, Ana M. et al, 2021
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))
dc.subject.classificationRefracció ocular
dc.subject.classificationInfants
dc.subject.classificationAdolescents
dc.subject.otherEye refraction
dc.subject.otherChildren
dc.subject.otherTeenagers
dc.titleComparative Study of Refraction between Wave Front-Based Refraction and Autorefraction without and with Cycloplegia in Children and Adolescents
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
children-09-00088.pdf
Mida:
741.41 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format