Polymicrobial intensive care unit-acquired pneumonia: prevalence, microbiology and outcome

dc.contributor.authorFerrer Monreal, Miquel
dc.contributor.authorDifrancesco, L.
dc.contributor.authorLiapikou, Adamantia
dc.contributor.authorRinaudo, Mariano
dc.contributor.authorCarbonara, M.
dc.contributor.authorLi Bassi, Gianluigi
dc.contributor.authorGabarrús, Albert
dc.contributor.authorGabarrús, Albert
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-06T11:23:24Z
dc.date.available2020-02-06T11:23:24Z
dc.date.issued2015-12-23
dc.date.updated2020-02-06T11:23:24Z
dc.description.abstractBackground Microbial aetiology of intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired pneumonia (ICUAP) determines antibiotic treatment and outcomes. The impact of polymicrobial ICUAP is not extensively known. We therefore investigated the characteristics and outcomes of polymicrobial aetiology of ICUAP. Method Patients with ICUAP confirmed microbiologically were prospectively compared according to identification of 1 (monomicrobial) or more (polymicrobial) potentially-pathogenic microorganisms. Microbes usually considered as non-pathogenic were not considered for the etiologic diagnosis. We assessed clinical characteristics, microbiology, inflammatory biomarkers and outcome variables. Results Among 441 consecutive patients with ICUAP, 256 (58 %) had microbiologic confirmation, and 41 (16 %) of them polymicrobial pneumonia. Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus, Haemophilus influenzae, and several Enterobacteriaceae were more frequent in polymicrobial pneumonia. Multi-drug and extensive-drug resistance was similarly frequent in both groups. Compared with monomicrobial, patients with polymicrobial pneumonia had less frequently chronic heart disease (6, 15 % vs. 71, 33 %, p = 0.019), and more frequently pleural effusion (18, 50 %, vs. 54, 25 %, p = 0.008), without any other significant difference. Appropriate empiric antimicrobial treatment was similarly frequent in the monomicrobial (185, 86 %) and the polymicrobial group (39, 95 %), as were the initial response to the empiric treatment, length of stay and mortality. Systemic inflammatory response was similar comparing monomicrobial with polymicrobial ICUAP. Conclusion The aetiology of ICUAP confirmed microbiologically was polymicrobial in 16 % cases. Pleural effusion and absence of chronic heart disease are associated with polymicrobial pneumonia. When empiric treatment is frequently appropriate, polymicrobial aetiology does not influence the outcome of ICUAP.
dc.format.extent10 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec659729
dc.identifier.issn1364-8535
dc.identifier.pmid26703094
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/149508
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBioMed Central
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-1165-5
dc.relation.ispartofCritical Care, 2015, vol. 19, num. 450
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-015-1165-5
dc.rightscc-by (c) Ferrer Monreal, Miquel et al., 2015
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Medicina)
dc.subject.classificationPneumònia adquirida a la comunitat
dc.subject.classificationRespiració artificial
dc.subject.otherCommunity-acquired pneumonia
dc.subject.otherArtificial respiration
dc.titlePolymicrobial intensive care unit-acquired pneumonia: prevalence, microbiology and outcome
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
659729.pdf
Mida:
730.6 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format