Sex-Divergent Clinical Outcomes and Precision Medicine: An Important New Role for Institutional Review Boards and Research Ethics Committees

dc.contributor.authorSegarra, Ignacio
dc.contributor.authorModamio Charles, Pilar
dc.contributor.authorFernández Lastra, Cecilia
dc.contributor.authorMariño Hernández, Eduardo L.
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-30T11:07:43Z
dc.date.available2019-07-30T11:07:43Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.date.updated2019-07-30T11:07:43Z
dc.description.abstractThe efforts toward individualized medicine have constantly increased in an attempt to improve treatment options. These efforts have led to the development of small molecules which target specific molecular pathways involved in cancer progression. We have reviewed preclinical studies of sunitinib that incorporate sex as a covariate to explore possible sex-based differences in pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interactions (DDI) to attempt a relationship with published clinical outputs. We observed that covariate sex is lacking in most clinical outcome reports and suggest a series of ethic-based proposals to improve research activities and identify relevant different sex outcomes. We propose a deeper integration of preclinical, clinical, and translational research addressing statistical and clinical significance jointly; to embed specific sexdivergent endpoints to evaluate possible gender differences objectively during all stages of research; to pay greater attention to sex-divergent outcomes in polypharmacy scenarios, DDI and bioequivalence studies; the clear reporting of preclinical and clinical findings regarding sex-divergent outcomes; as well as to encourage the active role of scientists and the pharmaceutical industry to foster a new scientific culture through their research programs, practice, and participation in editorial boards and Institutional Ethics Review Boards (IRBs) and Research Ethics Committees (RECs). We establish the IRB/REC as the centerpiece for the implementation of these proposals. We suggest the expansion of its competence to follow up clinical trials to ensure that sex differences are addressed and recognized; to engage in data monitoring committees to improve clinical research cooperation and ethically address those potential clinical outcome differences between male and female patients to analyze their social and clinical implications in research and healthcare policies. Keywords: sunitinib, sex-divergent pharmacokinetics, clinical outcomes, covariate sex, research ethics, IRB, ELSI
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec678889
dc.identifier.issn1663-9812
dc.identifier.pmid28785221
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/138571
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherFrontiers Media
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2017.00488
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Pharmacology, 2017, vol. 8, p. 488
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2017.00488
dc.rightscc-by (c) Segarra Bañeres, Ignacio et al., 2017
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Farmàcia, Tecnologia Farmacèutica i Fisicoquímica)
dc.subject.classificationFarmacocinètica
dc.subject.classificationBioètica
dc.subject.classificationDiferències entre sexes
dc.subject.otherPharmacokinetics
dc.subject.otherBioethics
dc.subject.otherSex differences
dc.titleSex-Divergent Clinical Outcomes and Precision Medicine: An Important New Role for Institutional Review Boards and Research Ethics Committees
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
678889.pdf
Mida:
461.83 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format