Amb motiu del tancament d'estiu, la validació de documents es reprendrà a partir del 28 d'agost de 2026. Disculpeu les molèsties.
Con motivo del cierre de verano, la validación de documentos se reanudará a partir del 28 de agosto de 2026. Disculpad las molestias
Due to the summer closure, document validation will resume starting August 28, 2026. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Fitxers

937763.pdf (831.54 KB)

Tipus de document

Article

Versió

Versió publicada

Data de publicació

2025-09-26

Llicència de publicació

cc-by-nc (c) Queralt, S. et al., 2025
Si us plau utilitzeu sempre aquest identificador per citar o enllaçar aquest document: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/229836

AI, Human, or Hybrid? Reliability of AI Detection Tools in Multi-Authored Texts

Títol de la revista

Autors

Director/Tutor

ISSN de la revista

Títol del volum

Recurs relacionat

https://doi.org/10.4114/INTELETICA.vol2iss4pp102-114.

Resum

This article presents the first results of the CorpIdentIA project (Corpus Identity & Authorship Intelligence Analysis), focused on the analysis of texts generated wholly or partially by artificial intelligence. Based on an experimental Spanish corpus (n = 180) that includes human, artificial, and mixed texts, the study analyzes the performance of three detectors (Originality.ai, GPTZero, and Copyleaks) against different generative models (ChatGPT, Gemini, and Grok). The main objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of different AI detection tools in classifying these texts according to their origin (AI, human, or hybrid). The results reveal significant differences among tools: Originality.ai shows the best overall performance, while GPTZero stands out for its low rate of false positives. However, none of the tools demonstrates acceptable reliability in detecting hybrid texts. Recurrent biases are observed depending on the AI model, along with misclassifications with high confidence, which raises risks in the implementation of these tools without expert human review. This work contributes to the current debate on the trustworthiness of detectors, the risk of false accusations in forensic contexts, and the need for explainable approaches from applied linguistics. Besides, these findings underline the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration between linguists, computer scientists, and legal experts.

Matèries

Anàlisi del discurs, Lingüística forense, Intel·ligència artificial

Matèries (anglès)

Discourse analysis, Forensic linguistics, Artificial intelligence

Citació

Col·leccions

Divulgació i Premsa (Filologia Catalana i Lingüística General)

Citació

QUERALT, Sheila, et al. AI, Human, or Hybrid? Reliability of AI Detection Tools in Multi-Authored Texts. Intelética. Inteligencia Artificial. Ética y Sociedad. Vol.  2025, num. 2, pags. 4. [consulted: 24 of August of 2026]. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/229836

Exportar metadades

JSON - METS

Compartir registre