Hpv-relatedness Definitions For Classifying Hpv-related Oropharyngeal Cancer Patient Do Impact On Tnm Classification And Patients' Survival

Abstract

Background Given the different nature and better outcomes of oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC) associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, a novel clinical stage classification for HPV-related OPC has been accepted for the 8 th edition AJCC TNM (ICON-S model). However, it is still unclear the HPV-relatedness definition with best diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value. Material and methods The aim of this study was to compare different staging system models proposed for HPV-related OPC patients: 7 th edition AJCC TNM, RPA stage with non-anatomic factors (Princess Margaret), RPA with N categories for nasopharyngeal cancer (MD-Anderson) and AHR-new (ICON-S), according to different HPV-relatedness definitions: HPV-DNA detection plus an additional positive marker (p16(INK4a) or HPV-mRNA), p16(INK4a) positivity alone or the combination of HPV-DNA/p16(INK4a) positivity as diagnostic tests. Results A total of 788 consecutive OPC cases diagnosed from 1991 to 2013 were considered eligible for the analysis. Of these samples, 66 (8.4%) were positive for HPV-DNA and (p16(INK4a) or HPV-mRNA), 83 (10.5%) were p16(INK4a) positive and 58 (7.4%) were double positive for HPV-DNA/p16(INK4a). ICON-S model was the staging system, which performed better in our series when using at least two biomarkers to define HPV-causality. When the same analysis was performed considering only p16(INK4a)-positivity, RPA stage with non-anatomic factors (Princess Margaret) has the best classification based on AIC criteria. Conclusion HPV-relatedness definition for classifying HPV-related OPC patient do impact on TNM classification and patients' survival. Further studies assessing HPV-relatedness definitions are warranted to better classify HPV-related OPC patients in the era of de-escalation clinical trials.