Effectiveness of Fingolimod versus Natalizumab as Second-Line Therapy for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in Spain: Second-Line GATE Study

dc.contributor.authorMeca Lallana, José E.
dc.contributor.authorAyuso, Teresa
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Yélamos, Sergio
dc.contributor.authorDuran, Carmen
dc.contributor.authorContreras Martín, Yessica
dc.contributor.authorHerrera Navarro, Nicolás
dc.contributor.authorPérez Sempere, Angel
dc.contributor.authorÁlvarez Cermeño, José C.
dc.contributor.authorMillán Pascual, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorMeca Lallana, Virginia
dc.contributor.authorRomero Sevilla, Raúl
dc.contributor.authorRicart, Javier
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-03T17:10:08Z
dc.date.available2021-02-03T17:10:08Z
dc.date.issued2020-05-01
dc.date.updated2021-01-25T08:13:23Z
dc.description.abstractBackground: There is a lack of head-to-head studies comparing the efficacy of fingolimod (FIN) and natalizumab (NTZ) as second-line therapy for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Methods: Multicenter, observational study, in which, information of 388 patients randomly selected and treated with FIN or NTZ in routine clinical practice was retrospectively collected with the main objective of comparing the annualized relapse rate (ARR) over the first year, after FIN or NTZ treatment initiation. Results: Mean ARR during the first year of treatment was 0.28 in FIN group and 0.12 in NTZ group (p = 0.0064); nevertheless, the difference between groups lost statistical significance when the propensity score analysis was performed. Time to disability -progression was similar in both treatment groups (12.3 +/- 6.7 months in FIN, and 12.8 +/- 0.1 months in NTZ; p = 0.4654). Treatment persistence after the first year of treatment was higher in patients treated with FIN (95%) than in those treated with NTZ (84%; p = 0.0014). Conclusions: After 12 months of treatment, both FIN and NTZ reduced the ARR, but ARR percent reduction was significantly higher with NTZ. Treatment persistence was higher in patients receiving FIN.
dc.format.extent9 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.pmid32187609
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/173668
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherKarger AG
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1159/000505778
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Neurology, 2020, vol. 83, p. 25-33
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1159/000505778
dc.rightscc by-nc-nd (c) Meca Lallana et al., 2020
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))
dc.subject.classificationEsclerosi múltiple
dc.subject.classificationInhibidors enzimàtics
dc.subject.otherMultiple sclerosis
dc.subject.otherEnzyme inhibitors
dc.titleEffectiveness of Fingolimod versus Natalizumab as Second-Line Therapy for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in Spain: Second-Line GATE Study
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
Meca-LallanaJ.pdf
Mida:
430 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format