Amb motiu del tancament d'estiu, la validació de documents es reprendrà a partir del 28 d'agost de 2026. Disculpeu les molèsties.
Con motivo del cierre de verano, la validación de documentos se reanudará a partir del 28 de agosto de 2026. Disculpad las molestias
Due to the summer closure, document validation will resume starting August 28, 2026. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Fitxers

674221.pdf (505.89 KB)

Tipus de document

Article

Versió

Versió publicada

Data de publicació

2016

Llicència de publicació

cc-by (c) Marques, Teresa, 2016
Si us plau utilitzeu sempre aquest identificador per citar o enllaçar aquest document: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/147064

We can't have no satisfaction

Títol de la revista

Autors

Director/Tutor

ISSN de la revista

Títol del volum

Recurs relacionat

https://doi.org/10.4013/fsu.2016.173.07

Resum

Many authors agree that there is a dimension of conflict expressed through discourse that eludes purely semantic approaches. How and why do conative attitudes conflict? The latter question is the object of this paper. Conflicts of attitudes are typically modelled on one of two models. The first imposes a Subjective Rationality constraint on conflicting attitudes, and the second depends on the impossibility of Joint Satisfaction. This paper assesses whether either of the two conditions can account for conflicting attitudes. First, it argues that Subjective Rationality cannot account for intersubjective conflicts. Second, it presents putative counterexamples to Joint Satisfaction. The counterexamples arise on the assumption that the attitudes are first personal. The paper then explores two alternatives: nihilism about attitudinal conflicts, and dropping the assumption that the relevant attitudes are first-personal states. Embracing nihilism would be devastating for expressivists and other non-cognitivists. But dropping the assumption on which the counterexamples to Satisfaction depend requires a new account of the conative attitudes expressed in value discourse. The paper concludes by pointing to an alternative.

Matèries

Filosofia del llenguatge, Conflicte (Psicologia), Discussió, Anàlisi del discurs

Matèries (anglès)

Philosophy of language, Conflict (Psychology), Discussion, Discourse analysis

Citació

Col·leccions

Articles publicats en revistes (Filosofia)
Publicacions de projectes de recerca finançats per la UE

Citació

MARQUES, Teresa. We can't have no satisfaction. Filosofia Unisinos. 2016. Vol. 17, num. 3, pags. 308-314. ISSN 1519-5023. [consulted: 11 of August of 2026]. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/147064

Exportar metadades

JSON - METS

Compartir registre