Carregant...
Fitxers
Tipus de document
TesiVersió
Versió publicadaData de publicació
Tots els drets reservats
Si us plau utilitzeu sempre aquest identificador per citar o enllaçar aquest document: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/226947
Mecanismos extrajudiciales de resolución de conflictos en el ámbito laboral. Un estudio comparativo con la República de Corea
Títol de la revista
Director/Tutor
ISSN de la revista
Títol del volum
Recurs relacionat
Resum
[spa] La República de Corea es un milagro económico, un modelo a seguir en la esfera internacional. Sus características culturales de tradiciones y formalidades inamovibles no les han impedido tener la flexibilidad de utilizar el sistema civil o el sistema de derecho anglosajón, dependiendo de si la otra parte utiliza uno u otro. Pero se decantan por el sistema de derecho consuetudinario cuando es más oportuno mostrar flexibilidad. Además, sus características culturales no les han impedido globalizarse y convertirse en un gigante financiero en tiempo récord. En cuanto a su sistema de Resolución Alternativa de Conflictos, es similar al que se ha intentado crear en España, mediante la creación de una sede internacional, y no ha tenido la misma repercusión, ya que la sede coreana, a partir de ahora KCAB, cumple con éxito sus expectativas mientras que a los españoles aún les queda mucho camino por recorrer. En el ámbito laboral, tanto en el procedimiento arbitral como en la mediación utilizan un sistema totalmente diferente, con injerencia de la Administración Pública. Por estas razones es de interés conocer qué técnicas les son útiles y cuáles no lo son. Encontraremos que algunas son transferibles a España y otras no, a pesar de parecer una buena iniciativa. Este criterio extraído de la comparativa nos servirá para futuras propuestas en el ámbito de las técnicas de resolución de conflictos. Se dice que en España predomina la cultura del litigio, y que es difícil cambiarla. Corea es el claro ejemplo de que, a pesar de mantener características culturales aparentemente inamovibles, un país puede incluso cambiar su sistema legal y ser flexible en cuanto a la metodología. En palabras simples, han demostrado que si se quiere se puede.
[eng] The Republic of Korea is an Economic Miracle, a model role to follow in the international sphere. Their cultural characteristics of immovable traditions and formalities have not prevented them from having the flexibility to use the civil system or the common law system depending on whether it uses the civil system, but it switches to the common law system when it is more opportune to show flexibility. Also, their cultural characteristics have not prevented them from globalizing and becoming a financial giant in record time. As for its Alternative Dispute Resolution system, it is similar to the one that has been tried to be created in Spain, by creating an international headquarters, and it has not had the same repercussion, since the Korean headquarters, from now on KCAB, successfully meets its expectations while the Spanish still has a long way to go. We will see this later in more detail in the section on collecting the number of arbitrations. In the labor field they use a totally different system, with more interference of the Public Administration. For these reasons it is of interest to know which techniques are useful to them and which are not. We will find that some are transferable to Spain and others are not, despite seeming like a good initiative. This criterion extracted from the comparison will serve us for future proposals in the field of conflict resolution techniques. Korea is a clear example that, despite keeping apparently immovable cultural characteristics, a country can even change its legal system and be flexible in terms of methodology. In simple words, they have shown that if you want you can.
[eng] The Republic of Korea is an Economic Miracle, a model role to follow in the international sphere. Their cultural characteristics of immovable traditions and formalities have not prevented them from having the flexibility to use the civil system or the common law system depending on whether it uses the civil system, but it switches to the common law system when it is more opportune to show flexibility. Also, their cultural characteristics have not prevented them from globalizing and becoming a financial giant in record time. As for its Alternative Dispute Resolution system, it is similar to the one that has been tried to be created in Spain, by creating an international headquarters, and it has not had the same repercussion, since the Korean headquarters, from now on KCAB, successfully meets its expectations while the Spanish still has a long way to go. We will see this later in more detail in the section on collecting the number of arbitrations. In the labor field they use a totally different system, with more interference of the Public Administration. For these reasons it is of interest to know which techniques are useful to them and which are not. We will find that some are transferable to Spain and others are not, despite seeming like a good initiative. This criterion extracted from the comparison will serve us for future proposals in the field of conflict resolution techniques. Korea is a clear example that, despite keeping apparently immovable cultural characteristics, a country can even change its legal system and be flexible in terms of methodology. In simple words, they have shown that if you want you can.
Matèries (anglès)
Citació
Col·leccions
Citació
GUARDIA FERNÁNDEZ, Ana belinda. Mecanismos extrajudiciales de resolución de conflictos en el ámbito laboral. Un estudio comparativo con la República de Corea. [consulta: 21 de febrer de 2026]. [Disponible a: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/226947]