Anatomical Modifications After Stent Implantation: A Comparative Analysis Between CGuard, Wallstent, and Roadsaver Carotid Stents

dc.contributor.authorGinanni Corradini, Luca
dc.contributor.authorBalocco, Simone
dc.contributor.authorMaresca, Luciano
dc.contributor.authorVitale, Silvio
dc.contributor.authorStefanini, Matteo
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-14T06:29:43Z
dc.date.available2023-04-14T06:29:43Z
dc.date.issued2022-02-03
dc.date.updated2023-04-14T06:29:43Z
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Carotid revascularization can be associated with modifications of the vascular geometry, which may lead to complications. The changes on the vessel angulation before and after a carotid WallStent (WS) implantation are compared against 2 new dual-layer devices, CGuard (CG) and RoadSaver (RS). Materials and methods: The study prospectively recruited 217 consecutive patients (112 GC, 73 WS, and 32 RS, respectively). Angiography projections were explored and the one having a higher arterial angle was selected as a basal view. After stent implantation, a stent control angiography was performed selecting the projection having the maximal angle. The same procedure is followed in all the 3 stent types to guarantee comparable conditions. The angulation changes on the stented segments were quantified from both angiographies. The statistical analysis quantitatively compared the pre-and post-angles for the 3 stent types. The results are qualitatively illustrated using boxplots. Finally, the relation between pre- and post-angles measurements is analyzed using linear regression. Results: For CG, no statistical difference in the axial vessel geometry between the basal and postprocedural angles was found. For WS and RS, statistical difference was found between pre- and post-angles. The regression analysis shows that CG induces lower changes from the original curvature with respect to WS and RS. Conclusion: Based on our results, CG determines minor changes over the basal morphology than WS and RS stents. Hence, CG respects better the native vessel anatomy than the other stents.Level of Evidence: Level 4, Case Series.
dc.format.extent7 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec718190
dc.identifier.issn1526-6028
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/196780
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSAGE Publications
dc.relation.isformatofVersió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028221075559
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Endovascular Therapy, 2022, vol. 30, num. 1, p. 18-24
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/15266028221075559
dc.rights(c) Ginanni Corradini, Luca et al., 2022
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Matemàtiques i Informàtica)
dc.subject.classificationAngiografia
dc.subject.classificationPròtesis de Stent
dc.subject.classificationInvestigació quantitativa
dc.subject.otherAngiography
dc.subject.otherStents (Surgery)
dc.subject.otherQuantitative research
dc.titleAnatomical Modifications After Stent Implantation: A Comparative Analysis Between CGuard, Wallstent, and Roadsaver Carotid Stents
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
718190.pdf
Mida:
723.93 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format