Infection by Strongyloides stercoralis in immigrants with Chagas disease: evaluation of eosinophilia as screening method in primary care

dc.contributor.authorDopico Ponte, Eva M.
dc.contributor.authorRando-Matos, Yolanda
dc.contributor.authorSolsona Diaz, Lluís
dc.contributor.authorAlmeda, Jesús
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Fred Luciano Neves
dc.contributor.authorVinuesa Aumedes, Teresa
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-16T11:20:00Z
dc.date.available2020-12-16T06:10:23Z
dc.date.issued2019-12-16
dc.date.updated2020-04-16T11:20:00Z
dc.description.abstractObjectives: to evaluate co-infection of Strongyloides stercoralis and Trypanosoma cruzi and to assess eosinophilia as a screening test for the detection of S. stercoralis infection in patients with Chagas disease (CD). Methods: a retrospective diagnostic validation study was performed on serum samples from primary care patients diagnosed with CD in the southern Barcelona metropolitan area. All samples with eosinophilia (n = 87) and a random sample of non-eosinophilic sera (n = 180) were selected. Diagnosis of CD was based on positive serology by means of two tests: ORTHO® T. cruzi ELISA test, and BIO-FLASH® Chagas or Bioelisa CHAGAS. SCIMEDX ELISA STRONGY-96 was used to diagnose strongyloidiasis. Results: strongyloides stercoralis serology was positive in 15% of patients of whom 95% showed eosinophilia, vs. 21% of those with negative serology (P < 0.001), with differences in the mean eosinophil count (0.49 vs. 0.27 × 109 /l). Only 1.1% of patients with CD but without eosinophilia presented positive serology for S. stercoralis, whereas 44% of patients with CD and eosinophilia did (P < 0.001). Sensitivity and specificity values for eosinophilia were thus 95% and 79%, respectively. PPV was 42.5% and NPV, 98.9%. Conclusions: the prevalence of co-infection by T. cruzi and S. stercoralis is not negligible and has probably been underestimated for years in many areas, due to frequently subclinical infections. Therefore, serology seems mandatory for these patients and the use of eosinophilia as initial screening could facilitate the task, decreasing the number of analyses to be performed.
dc.format.extent14 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec695312
dc.identifier.issn1360-2276
dc.identifier.pmid31845476
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/155527
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons
dc.relation.isformatofVersió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.13363
dc.relation.ispartofTropical Medicine & International Health, 2019
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.13363
dc.rights(c) Dopico, Eva et al., 2019
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Patologia i Terapèutica Experimental)
dc.subject.classificationMalaltia de Chagas
dc.subject.classificationMigrants
dc.subject.classificationEosinofília
dc.subject.classificationInfeccions
dc.subject.classificationAtenció primària
dc.subject.otherChagas' disease
dc.subject.otherMigrants
dc.subject.otherEosinophilia
dc.subject.otherInfections
dc.subject.otherPrimary health care
dc.titleInfection by Strongyloides stercoralis in immigrants with Chagas disease: evaluation of eosinophilia as screening method in primary care
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
695312.pdf
Mida:
5.8 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format