Randomized Trial of Ceftazidime-Avibactam vs Meropenem for Treatment of Hospital-Acquired and Ventilator-Associated Bacterial Pneumonia (REPROVE): Analyses per US FDA-Specified End Points

dc.contributor.authorTorres Martí, Antoni
dc.contributor.authorRank, Doug
dc.contributor.authorMelnick, David
dc.contributor.authorRekeda, Ludmyla
dc.contributor.authorChen, Xiang
dc.contributor.authorRiccobene, Todd
dc.contributor.authorCritchley, Ian A.
dc.contributor.authorLakkis, Hassan D.
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Dianna
dc.contributor.authorTalley, Angela K.
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-27T15:44:34Z
dc.date.available2020-05-27T15:44:34Z
dc.date.issued2019-04-25
dc.date.updated2020-05-27T15:44:35Z
dc.description.abstractBackground: Hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia (HAP/VAP; nosocomial pneumonia) due to Gram-negative pathogens are associated with significant morbidity and mortality; treatment options for multidrug-resistant infections are limited. The pivotal phase III REPROVE trial evaluated the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) vs meropenem in the treatment of patients with HAP/VAP. Study results for prespecified analyses per US Food and Drug Administration-recommended trial end points are reported here. Methods: Hospitalized adults with HAP/VAP proven or suspected to be caused by a Gram-negative pathogen were randomized 1:1 to receive CAZ-AVI or meropenem for 7 to 14 days. The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Secondary outcomes included clinical cure at test of cure (TOC) in the ITT and microbiological ITT (micro-ITT) populations, and safety and tolerability throughout the study. Results: hundred seventy randomized patients received treatment and were included in the ITT population (CAZ-AVI, n = 436; meropenem, n = 434). CAZ-AVI was noninferior to meropenem for the primary end point (28-day all-cause mortality; ITT) based on the prespecified 10% noninferiority margin (CAZ-AVI, 9.6%; meropenem, 8.3%; difference, 1.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.4% to 5.3%) and for the clinical cure end point in the ITT population based on a prespecified -10% noninferiority margin (CAZ-AVI, 67.2%; meropenem, 69.1%; difference, −1.9%; 95% CI, -8.1% to 4.3%). Clinical cure rates at TOC for patients infected with CAZ-nonsusceptible pathogens were similar (CAZ-AVI, 75.5%; meropenem, 71.2%; micro-ITT). Safety data were consistent with established safety profiles for both agents. Conclusions: CAZ-AVI provides an important new treatment option for HAP/VAP due to Gram-negative pathogens, including CAZ-nonsusceptible strains.
dc.format.extent11 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec698269
dc.identifier.issn2328-8957
dc.identifier.pmid31041348
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/162663
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz149
dc.relation.ispartofOpen Forum Infectious Diseases, 2019, vol. 6, num. 4, p. 149
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz149
dc.rightscc-by-nc-nd (c) Torres Martí, Antoni et al., 2019
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Medicina)
dc.subject.classificationPneumònia adquirida a la comunitat
dc.subject.classificationMicroorganismes patògens
dc.subject.classificationFarmacologia
dc.subject.otherCommunity-acquired pneumonia
dc.subject.otherPathogenic microorganisms
dc.subject.otherPharmacology
dc.titleRandomized Trial of Ceftazidime-Avibactam vs Meropenem for Treatment of Hospital-Acquired and Ventilator-Associated Bacterial Pneumonia (REPROVE): Analyses per US FDA-Specified End Points
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
698269.pdf
Mida:
547.34 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format