Atogepant after anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies failure in migraine: a multicenter real-world study of effectiveness, safety, persistence and predictors of response

dc.contributor.authorMuñoz Vendrell, Albert
dc.contributor.authorCampoy Diaz, Sergio
dc.contributor.authorValín-Villanueva, Paloma
dc.contributor.authorCasas Limón, Javier
dc.contributor.authorFernández Lázaro, Iris
dc.contributor.authorGonzález García, Nuria
dc.contributor.authorSantos Lasaosa, Sonia
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Osorio, Yésica
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Martínez, Alicia
dc.contributor.authorCampdelacreu, Jaume
dc.contributor.authorPortocarrero Sánchez, Leonardo
dc.contributor.authorCano Sánchez, Luis Miguel
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Sánchez, Sonia María
dc.contributor.authorPérez de la Parte, Alba
dc.contributor.authorMorollón Sánchez-Mateos, Noemí
dc.contributor.authorLópez Bravo, Alba
dc.contributor.authorMínguez Olaondo, Ane
dc.contributor.authorSánchez Soblechero, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorLozano Ros, Alberto
dc.contributor.authorMorales Hernández, Cristian
dc.contributor.authorAndrés López, Alberto
dc.contributor.authorLayos Romero, Almudena
dc.contributor.authorCaronna, Edoardo
dc.contributor.authorTorres Ferrús, Marta
dc.contributor.authorAlpuente, Alicia
dc.contributor.authorPozo Rosich, Patricia
dc.contributor.authorBelvís, Robert
dc.contributor.authorGarcia Azorin, David
dc.contributor.authorDíaz de Terán, Javier
dc.contributor.authorGuerrero Peral, Ángel Luis
dc.contributor.authorGago Veiga, Ana Beatriz
dc.contributor.authorHuerta Villanueva, Mariano
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-18T07:45:13Z
dc.date.available2026-02-18T07:45:13Z
dc.date.issued2025-11-28
dc.date.updated2026-02-09T15:25:10Z
dc.description.abstractBackground Atogepant is approved for migraine prevention and has shown strong efficacy in clinical trials. However, its effectiveness following failure of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) has not been evaluated in large real-world populations. Methods This multicenter observational study conducted across Spanish headache units included adults with migraine who initiated atogepant after failure of >= 1 anti-CGRP MAb and had >= 3 months of follow-up. Baseline demographic and clinical variables were collected prospectively, with follow-up assessments at months 3 and 6. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving a >= 50% reduction in monthly migraine days (MMD) at three months. Secondary outcomes included >= 30%, >= 75%, and 100% response rates; changes in headache days, pain intensity, acute medication use, and patient-reported outcomes; adverse events; treatment persistence; and factors associated with response. Results A total of 252 patients were included (mean age 48.9 +/- 12 years; 83.3% female; 80.6% with chronic migraine; 45.6% with continuous daily headache). Prior to atogepant, 39.7% had failed one anti-CGRP MAb, 27.0% two, 20.2% three, and 13.1% four. Median baseline MMD was 16, monthly headache days 27, and acute medication days 20. At 3 months, 44.4% achieved a >= 30% reduction in MMD, 29.7% >= 50%, and 11.7% >= 75%. Adverse events were reported in 52.5% of patients, most commonly constipation (30%) and nausea (25%). At three months, 26.2% had discontinued treatment (65.1% due to inefficacy, 28.8% due to intolerance). Treatment persistence at 180 days was 61% (95% CI 54 to 69%). A higher number of previously failed MAbs was independently associated with reduced odds of >= 50% response (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.97). Moreover, a higher number of previously failed MAbs was associated with diminished improvements across multiple clinical endpoints, including headache frequency, intensity, acute medication use, and disability measures. Conclusion Atogepant may represent a viable treatment option for patients with migraine who have failed anti-CGRP MAbs. In this large real-world cohort, approximately one-third of patients achieved a >= 50% response, despite a treatment-refractory profile. However, the likelihood of response decreases with a higher number of previously failed MAbs, and mild adverse events are frequent.
dc.format.extent12 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.pmid41315923
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/226996
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-025-02239-1
dc.relation.ispartofThe Journal of Headache and Pain, 2025, vol. 27, num. 2, p. 1-12
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-025-02239-1
dc.rightscc by (c) Muñoz-Vendrell, Albert, et al, 2026
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.classificationCefalàlgiacat
dc.subject.classificationMigmatitacat
dc.subject.classificationReceptors neuralscat
dc.subject.otherHeadacheeng
dc.subject.otherMigmatiteeng
dc.subject.otherNeural receptor
dc.titleAtogepant after anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies failure in migraine: a multicenter real-world study of effectiveness, safety, persistence and predictors of response
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
s10194-025-02239-1.pdf
Mida:
2.53 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format