Amb motiu del tancament d'estiu, la validació de documents es reprendrà a partir del 28 d'agost de 2026. Disculpeu les molèsties.
Con motivo del cierre de verano, la validación de documentos se reanudará a partir del 28 de agosto de 2026. Disculpad las molestias
Due to the summer closure, document validation will resume starting August 28, 2026. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Files

861404.pdf (1.28 MB)

Document type

Article

Version

Published version

Publication date

2024-12-01

Publication license

cc-by (c) Stefana, A. et al., 2024
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/220030

Assessing the patient’s affective perception of their psychotherapist: validation of the in-Session Patient Affective Reactions Questionnaire

Journal Title

Authors

Director/Tutor

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Related resource

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1346760

Abstract

Background: Psychotherapists need effective tools to monitor changes in the patient's affective perception of the therapist and the therapeutic relationship during sessions to tailor therapeutic interventions and improve treatment outcomes. This study aims to evaluate the factor structure, reliability, and validity of the in-Session Patient Affective Reactions Questionnaire (SPARQ), a concise self-report measure designed for practical application in real-world psychotherapy settings. Methods: Validation data was gathered from (N = 700) adult patients in individual psychotherapy. These patients completed the SPARQ in conjunction with additional measures capturing sociodemographic details, characteristics of therapeutic interventions, individual personality traits, mental health symptom severity, elements of the therapeutic relationship, and session outcomes. This comprehensive approach was employed to assess the construct and criterion-related validity of the SPARQ. Results: The SPARQ has a two-factor structure: Positive Affect (k = 4, ω total = .87) and Negative Affect (k = 4, ω total = .75). Bifactor confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) yielded the following fit indices: X2[df] = 2.53, CFI = .99; TLI = .98; RMSEA = .05; and SRMR = .02. Multi-group CFAs demonstrated measurement invariance (i) across patients who attended psychotherapy sessions in person versus in remote mode, and (ii) across patients with and without psychiatric diagnoses confirmed metric invariance. Furthermore, the SPARQ showed meaningful correlations with concurrently administered measures. Discussion: The SPARQ proves to be a valuable instrument in clinical, training, and research contexts, adept at capturing patients' session-level affective responses towards their therapist and perceptions of the therapeutic alliance. Comprehensive descriptive statistics and a range of score precision indices have been reported, intended to serve as benchmarks for future research.

Subject

Transferència (Psicologia), Psicoteràpia, Relacions psicoterapeuta-pacient

Subject (English)

Transference (Psychology), Psychotherapy, Psychotherapist and patient

Citation

Collections

Articles publicats en revistes (Medicina)
Articles publicats en revistes (IDIBAPS: Institut d'investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer)

Citation

STEFANA, Alberto, et al. Assessing the patient’s affective perception of their psychotherapist: validation of the in-Session Patient Affective Reactions Questionnaire. Frontiers In Psychiatry. 2024. Vol. 15. ISSN 1664-0640. [consulted: 9 of August of 2026]. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/220030

Export metadata

JSON - METS

Share record