Comparative study of two needle models in terms of deflection during inferior alveolar nerve block

dc.contributor.authorDelgado Molina, Esther
dc.contributor.authorTamarit Borràs, Meritxell
dc.contributor.authorBerini Aytés, Leonardo
dc.contributor.authorGay Escoda, Cosme
dc.date.accessioned2014-03-20T11:04:23Z
dc.date.available2014-03-20T11:04:23Z
dc.date.issued2009-09-01
dc.date.updated2014-03-20T11:04:23Z
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The purpose of this study is to determine the possible differences in deflection between two needles of same length and external gauge but with different internal gauges during truncal block of the inferior alveolar nerve. The initial working hypothesis was that greater deflection may be expected with larger internal gauge needles. Study design: Four clinicians subjected 346 patients to inferior alveolar nerve block and infiltrating anesthesia of the buccal nerve trajectory for the surgical or conventional extraction of the lower third molar. A nonautoaspirating syringe system with 2 types of needle was used: a standard 27-gauge x 35-mm needle with an internal gauge of 0.215 mm or an XL Monoprotect® 27-gauge x 35-mm needle with an internal gauge of 0.265 mm. The following information was systematically recorded for each patient: needle type, gender, anesthetic technique (direct or indirect truncal block) and the number of bone contacts during the procedure, the patient-extraction side, the practitioner performing the technique, and blood aspiration (either positive or negative). Results: 346 needles were used in total. 190 were standard needles (27-gauge x 35-mm needle with an internal gauge of 0.215 mm) and 156 were XL Monoprotect®. Incidence of deflection was observed in 49.1% of cases (170 needles) where 94 were standard needles and 76 XL Monoprotect®. Needle torsion ranged from 0º and 6º. Conclusions: No significant differences were recorded in terms of deflection and internal gauge, operator, patient-extraction side, the anesthetic technique involved and the number of bone contacts during the procedure
dc.format.extent5 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec608848
dc.identifier.issn1698-4447
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/52686
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherMedicina Oral SL
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: http://www.medicinaoral.com/medoralfree01/v14i9/medoralv14i9p440.pdf; http://www.medicinaoral.com/
dc.relation.isformatofPodeu consultar la versió en castellà del document a: http://hdl.handle.net/2445/146097
dc.relation.ispartofMedicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugia Bucal, 2009, vol. 14, num. 9, p. 440-444
dc.rights(c) Medicina Oral SL, 2009
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Odontoestomatologia)
dc.subject.classificationExtracció dental
dc.subject.classificationAnestèsia en odontologia
dc.subject.classificationMaterials dentals
dc.subject.classificationNervi trigemin
dc.subject.otherTeeth extraction
dc.subject.otherAnesthesia in dentistry
dc.subject.otherDental materials
dc.subject.otherTrigeminal nerve
dc.titleComparative study of two needle models in terms of deflection during inferior alveolar nerve block
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
608848.pdf
Mida:
334.99 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format