Error monitoring and correction in violin performance: An EEG study

dc.contributor.authorBlanco, Ángel David
dc.contributor.authorCosta Faidella, Jordi
dc.contributor.authorPérez Carrillo, Alfonso
dc.contributor.authorDalmazzo, David
dc.contributor.authorRamirez Melendez, Rafael
dc.contributor.authorSan Miguel Insua, Iria
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-27T18:52:58Z
dc.date.available2026-01-27T18:52:58Z
dc.date.issued2025-07-09
dc.date.updated2026-01-27T18:52:59Z
dc.description.abstractPrevious research using electroencephalography (EEG) has investigated neural error-related music production processes in expert pianists reporting a frontal event-related negativity followed by a P300 event-related potential (ERP) after mistuned notes. However, piano playing does not rely on auditory feedback and corrective movements when dealing with accurate note tuning, thus offering an incomplete picture about error monitoring processes in players of many other musical instruments, including the human voice. We here designed a setup allowing us to collect the EEG of expert bow-string players while performing short melodies on the violin, (a fretless instrument) while also manipulating in real-time the produced pitch in a controlled manner. 15 expert bow-string players were asked to 1) listen to a reference melody of four notes; 2) play that melody with a violin (Active Condition); and 3) listen passively to the replay of their performance (Replayed Condition). Randomly, the auditory feedback of one of the four melody notes was manipulated in the Active Condition by lowering or lifting the pitch by half semitone. We found that mistuned notes, independently of whether they were manipulated externally or were produced by natural playing errors, elicited an f-ERN followed by a P300. We also found that the amplitude of the f-ERN was larger for faster corrective movements than for slower ones. In addition, between the f-ERN and the P300, we also identified two negative components-one in parietal areas and another in central-right regions-whose amplitudes were greater for slower corrective movements. We suggest the existence of two error-monitoring systems: a "fast" system mediated by the medial frontal cortex that quickly corrects errors when certainty is high and a "slow" system mediated by the posterior parietal cortex that accumulates evidence under uncertainty before triggering correction.
dc.format.extent20 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec760860
dc.identifier.issn1053-8119
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/226297
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121365
dc.relation.ispartofNeuroimage, 2025, vol. 318, 121365
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121365
dc.rightscc by (c) Blanco, Ángel David et al., 2025
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Psicologia Clínica i Psicobiologia)
dc.subject.classificationElectroencefalografia
dc.subject.classificationXarxes neuronals (Neurobiologia)
dc.subject.classificationPianistes
dc.subject.otherElectroencephalography
dc.subject.otherNeural networks (Neurobiology)
dc.subject.otherPianists
dc.titleError monitoring and correction in violin performance: An EEG study
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
901048.pdf
Mida:
16.92 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format