A Prospective, Multicenter, Real-World Registry of Coronary Lithotripsy in Calcified Coronary Arteries

dc.contributor.authorRodriguez-leor, Oriol
dc.contributor.authorCid-alvarez, Ana Belen
dc.contributor.authorLopez-benito, Maria
dc.contributor.authorGonzalo, Nieves
dc.contributor.authorVilalta, Victoria
dc.contributor.authorDiarte De Miguel, Jose Antonio
dc.contributor.authorLópez, Leticia Fernandez
dc.contributor.authorJurado-roman, Alfonso
dc.contributor.authorDiego, Alejandro
dc.contributor.authorOteo, Juan Francisco
dc.contributor.authorCuellas, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorTrillo, Ramiro
dc.contributor.authorTravieso, Alejandro
dc.contributor.authorAlfonso, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorCarrillo, Xavier
dc.contributor.authorVegas-valle, José Miguel
dc.contributor.authorCortes-villar, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorPascual, Isaac
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz Camacho, Juan Francisco
dc.contributor.authorFlores, Xacobe
dc.contributor.authorVera-vera, Silvio
dc.contributor.authorMoreu, Jose
dc.contributor.authorBarreira De Sousa, Gilles
dc.contributor.authorMartí, David
dc.contributor.authorJimenez-mazuecos, Jesus
dc.contributor.authorFuertes, Monica
dc.contributor.authorOcaranza, Raymundo
dc.contributor.authorDe La Torre Hernandez, Jose Maria
dc.contributor.authorLozano, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorSolana Martinez, Santiago G.
dc.contributor.authorGómez-lara, Josep
dc.contributor.authorPerez De Prado, Armando
dc.contributor.authorBenito, Tomas
dc.contributor.authorEscaned, Javier
dc.contributor.authorSánchez, Javier Jimeno
dc.contributor.authorMoreiras, Javier Martin
dc.contributor.authorRivero, Borja
dc.contributor.authorNofrerias, Eduard Fernandez
dc.contributor.authorLozano, Iñigo
dc.contributor.authorRoldan, Juan
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-touchard, Arturo
dc.contributor.authorSerrano, Carlos Arellano
dc.contributor.authorRivero, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorAvanzas, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorAlmendarez, Marcel
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Ramon Calviño
dc.contributor.authorEsteban, Pablo Piñon
dc.contributor.authorYuskova, Maria
dc.contributor.authorRedondo, Alfredo
dc.contributor.authorD’ascoli, Giulio
dc.contributor.authorMas, Adria Tramullas
dc.contributor.authorPortero-portaz, Juan J.
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-camarero, Tamara
dc.contributor.authorMohandes, Mohsen
dc.contributor.authorRubio, Tomas Canton
dc.contributor.authorSuarez, Alfonso
dc.contributor.authorBayón, Jeremías
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Julio Peral
dc.contributor.authorSalgado, Carlos Alonso
dc.contributor.authorGómez-hospital, Joan Antoni
dc.contributor.authorGonzález, Reyes
dc.contributor.authorLópez-minguez, José Ramón
dc.contributor.authorPalazuelos, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorSliwinski, Frank
dc.contributor.authorFernandez, Guillermo Bastos
dc.contributor.authorDe Miguel Castro, Antonio
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-14T13:25:05Z
dc.date.available2024-10-14T13:25:05Z
dc.date.issued2024-03-01
dc.date.updated2024-10-03T14:26:10Z
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) has demonstrated effectiveness in the treatment of calcified lesions in selected patients with stable coronary disease. OBJECTIVES The authors sought to assess the performance of coronary IVL in calcified coronary lesions in a real-life, all comers, setting. METHODS The REPLICA-EPIC18 study prospectively enrolled consecutive patients treated with IVL in 26 centers in Spain. An independent core laboratory performed the angiographic analysis and event adjudication. The primary effectiveness endpoint assessed procedural success (successful IVL delivery, final diameter stenosis <20%, and absence of in- hospital major adverse cardiovascular events [MACE]). The primary safety endpoint measured freedom from MACE at 30 days. A predefined substudy compared outcomes between acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) patients. RESULTS A total of 426 patients (456 lesions) were included, 63% of the patients presenting with ACS. IVL delivery was successful in 99% of cases. Before IVL, 49% of lesions were considered undilatable. The primary effectiveness endpoint was achieved in 66% of patients, with similar rates among CCS patients (68%) and ACS patients (65%). Likewise, there were no significant differences in angiographic success after IVL between CCS and ACS patients. The rate of MACE at 30 days (primary safety endpoint) was 3% (1% in CCS and 5% in ACS patients [P = 0.073]). CONCLUSIONS Coronary IVL proved to be a feasible and safe procedure in a real-life setting, effectively facilitating stent implantation in severely calcified lesions. Patients with ACS on admission showed similar angiographic success rates but showed a trend toward higher 30-day MACE compared with patients with CCS. (REPLICA-EPIC18 study [Registry of Coronary Lithotripsy in Spain]; NCT04298307) (c) 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier on behalf of the American College of Cardiology Foundation. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/215747
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2023.12.018
dc.relation.ispartofJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2024, vol. 17, issue. 6, p. 756-767
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2023.12.018
dc.rightscc-by (c) Rodriguez-leor, Oriol et al., 2024
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))
dc.titleA Prospective, Multicenter, Real-World Registry of Coronary Lithotripsy in Calcified Coronary Arteries
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
1-s2.0-S1936879823016540-main.pdf
Mida:
933.68 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format