Document type
ArticleVersion
Published versionPublication date
Publication license
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/215275
Having a disagreement: expression, persuasion and demand
Journal Title
Authors
Director/Tutor
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Related resource
Abstract
It is common to distinguish between disagreement in the state sense (being in disagreement) and disagreement in the activity sense (having a disagreement). This paper deals with the question of what it is for two people to have a disagreement. First, I present and reject the thesis according to which having a disagreement is a matter of expressing conflicting attitudes. I argue that this is not sufficient for having a disagreement: two people can express conflicting attitudes without having a disagreement. Second, I present and reject the thesis according to which having a disagreement involves not only the expression of conflicting attitudes, but also the persuasive attempt to bring the other around to one’s view. I argue that this is not necessary for having a disagreement: two people can have a disagreement without trying to change each other’s minds. Finally, I put forward an alternative account that goes beyond the mere expression of conflicting attitudes, but that does not go as far as to posit the attempt to change someone’s mind. Having a disagreement, I submit, is a matter of expressing conflicting attitudes and demanding agreement, that is, advancing the normative claim that the other should share one’s attitude.
Subject (English)
Citation
Collections
Citation
PIETROIUSTI, Giulio. Having a disagreement: expression, persuasion and demand. Synthese. 2022. Vol. 200. ISSN 0039-7857. [consulted: 12 of August of 2026]. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/215275