Comprehensive update on implants in patients with head and neck cancer (2021–2024): systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of radiotherapy and chemotherapy on implant survival

dc.contributor.authorSchiegnitz, Eik
dc.contributor.authorFan, Shengchi
dc.contributor.authorDiaz, Leonardo
dc.contributor.authorSáenz-Ravello, Gustavo
dc.contributor.authorValmaseda Castellón, Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorAl-Nawas, Bilal
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-08T17:00:42Z
dc.date.available2025-09-08T17:00:42Z
dc.date.issued2025-12-01
dc.date.updated2025-09-08T17:00:42Z
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This study aimed to investigate implant outcomes in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy or chemotherapy by incorporating the latest research findings. Methods: The present review was conducted to update the focused question: What is the survival rate of implants placed in patients with head and neck cancer receiving radiotherapy or chemotherapy compared to non-irradiated patients? It built upon two previous systematic reviews (2014 and 2022) and provided an updated synthesis of the literature, focusing on clinical studies published between 2021 and 2024. The earlier reviews were included in the quantitative synthesis only to offer a broader longitudinal perspective. Results: Nine studies were identified, with seven included in the quantitative synthesis and meta-analysis. The implant survival rate was significantly lower in irradiated patients (85.6%) compared to non-irradiated patients (90.0%) (RR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.33-1.98, p < 0.0001, I2 = 0.2%). Additionally, implant failure risk was higher in grafted bone (RR = 2.03, 95% CI: 1.39-2.96, p = 0.0018, I2 = 21.9%) than in native bone. Among irradiated patients, those receiving radiochemotherapy exhibited an even greater risk of implant failure (RR = 1.97, 95% CI: 1.09-3.56, p = 0.0331, I2 = 0%) compared to non-irradiated patients. Conclusions: Current evidence indicates that radiotherapy/chemotherapy significantly increases the risk of implant loss in patients with head and neck cancer, with higher radiation doses possibly being associated with increased peri-implant bone loss, while implants placed in native bone exhibit a lower risk of failure compared to those placed in grafted bone.
dc.format.extent18 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec760059
dc.identifier.issn0905-7161
dc.identifier.pmid40530953
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/223045
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14450
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Oral Implants Research, 2025
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14450
dc.rightscc by-nc (c) Schiegnitz, Eik et al., 2025
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Odontoestomatologia)
dc.subject.classificationQuimioteràpia del càncer
dc.subject.classificationImplants dentals
dc.subject.classificationCàncer de cap
dc.subject.classificationCàncer de coll
dc.subject.otherCancer chemotherapy
dc.subject.otherDental implants
dc.subject.otherHead cancer
dc.subject.otherNeck cancer
dc.titleComprehensive update on implants in patients with head and neck cancer (2021–2024): systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of radiotherapy and chemotherapy on implant survival
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
898476.pdf
Mida:
570.63 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format