Amb motiu del tancament d'estiu, la validació de documents es reprendrà a partir del 28 d'agost de 2026. Disculpeu les molèsties.
Con motivo del cierre de verano, la validación de documentos se reanudará a partir del 28 de agosto de 2026. Disculpad las molestias
Due to the summer closure, document validation will resume starting August 28, 2026. We apologize for any inconvenience.

Document type

Article

Version

Published version

Publication date

Publication license

cc-by-nd (c) Marcovitch, Harvey et al., 2010
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/156778

Conflict of interest in science communication: more than a financial issue. Report from Esteve Foundation discussion group, April 2009

Journal Title

Director/Tutor

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Abstract

A systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that around 2% of scientists admit to have falsified research at least once. Up to 33% admit other questionable practices such as plagiarism, duplicate publication, undisclosed changes in pre-research protocols or dubious ethical behavior. There can be no doubt that discovered cases of research and publication misconduct represent a tip of an iceberg and many cases go unreported.

Citation

Citation

MARCOVITCH, Harvey, et al. Conflict of interest in science communication: more than a financial issue. Report from Esteve Foundation discussion group, April 2009. Croatian Medical Journal. 2010. Vol. 51, num. 1, pags. 7-15. ISSN 0353-9504. [consulted: 8 of August of 2026]. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/156778

Export metadata

JSON - METS

Share record