Carregant...
Miniatura

Tipus de document

Article

Versió

Versió publicada

Data de publicació

Llicència de publicació

cc-by (c) Castells Gómez et al., 2022
Si us plau utilitzeu sempre aquest identificador per citar o enllaçar aquest document: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/196245

Writing a synthesis versus reading: strategies involved and impact on comprehension

Títol de la revista

Director/Tutor

ISSN de la revista

Títol del volum

Resum

Little evidence is available regarding the differential impact of reading versus reading and writing on multiple source comprehension. The present study aims to: (1) compare the inferential comprehension performance of students in reading vs. reading/synthesis conditions; (2) explore the impact of performing the tasks on paper vs. on screen with Read&Answer (R&A) software; and (3) explore the extent to which rereading, notetaking, and the quality of the written synthesis can explain student's comprehension scores. For the students in the synthesis condition, we also examined the relationship between the quality of the synthesis they produced and the comprehension they achieved. 155 psychology undergraduates were randomly assigned either to the reading (n=78) or to the reading/synthesis condition (n=77). From this sample, 79 participants carried out the task with the Read&Answer software, and 76 solved the task on paper. All the students took a prior knowledge questionnaire, and read three complementary texts about the conception of intelligence. Students in the reading condition answered an inferential comprehension test, whereas students in the synthesis condition were asked to write a synthesis before taking the same test. Results show no differences in comprehension between students in the four conditions (task and media). There was no significant association between rereading and task condition. However, students in the synthesis condition were more likely to take notes. We found that two of the categories for the quality of the synthesis, textual organization and accuracy of content had an impact on inferential comprehension for the participants who wrote it. The quality of the synthesis mediated between student's prior knowledge and inferential comprehension.

Citació

Citació

CASTELLS GÓMEZ, Núria, MINGUELA, Marta, NADAL, Esther. Writing a synthesis versus reading: strategies involved and impact on comprehension. _Reading and Writing_. 2022. Vol. 36, núm. 849-880. [consulta: 20 de gener de 2026]. ISSN: 0922-4777. [Disponible a: https://hdl.handle.net/2445/196245]

Exportar metadades

JSON - METS

Compartir registre