A prospective evaluation of early detection biomarkers for ovarian cancer in the European EPIC cohort

dc.contributor.authorTerry, Kathryn L.
dc.contributor.authorSchock, Helena
dc.contributor.authorFortner, Renée T.
dc.contributor.authorHüsing, Anika
dc.contributor.authorFichorova, Raina N.
dc.contributor.authorYamamoto, Hidemi S.
dc.contributor.authorVitonis, Allison F.
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Theron
dc.contributor.authorOvervad, Kim
dc.contributor.authorTjønneland, Anne
dc.contributor.authorBoutron-Ruault, Marie-Christine
dc.contributor.authorMesrine, Sylvie
dc.contributor.authorSeveri, Gianluca
dc.contributor.authorDossus, Laure
dc.contributor.authorRinaldi, Sabina
dc.contributor.authorBoeing, Heiner
dc.contributor.authorBenetou, Vassiliki
dc.contributor.authorLagiou, Pagona
dc.contributor.authorTrichopoulou, Antonia
dc.contributor.authorKrogh, Vittorio
dc.contributor.authorKuhn, Elisabetta
dc.contributor.authorPanico, Salvatore
dc.contributor.authorBueno de Mesquita, H. Bas
dc.contributor.authorOnland-Moret, N. Charlotte
dc.contributor.authorPeeters, Petra H. M.
dc.contributor.authorTorhild Gram, Inger
dc.contributor.authorWeiderpass, Elisabete
dc.contributor.authorDuell, Eric J.
dc.contributor.authorSánchez, María José
dc.contributor.authorArdanaz, Eva
dc.contributor.authorEtxezarreta, Nerea
dc.contributor.authorNavarro, Carmen
dc.contributor.authorIdahl, Annika
dc.contributor.authorLundin, Eva
dc.contributor.authorJirström, Karin
dc.contributor.authorManjer, Jonas
dc.contributor.authorWareham, Nicholas J.
dc.contributor.authorKhaw, Kay-Tee
dc.contributor.authorSmith Byrne, Karl
dc.contributor.authorTravis, Ruth C.
dc.contributor.authorGunter, Marc J.
dc.contributor.authorMerritt, Melissa A.
dc.contributor.authorRiboli, Elio
dc.contributor.authorCramer, Daniel W.
dc.contributor.authorKaaks, Rudolf
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-29T14:27:07Z
dc.date.available2018-10-29T14:27:07Z
dc.date.issued2016-09-15
dc.date.updated2018-07-24T12:17:15Z
dc.description.abstractPurpose: About 60% of ovarian cancers are diagnosed at late stage, when 5-year survival is less than 30% in contrast to 90% for local disease. This has prompted search for early detection biomarkers. For initial testing, specimens taken months or years before ovarian cancer diagnosis are the best source of information to evaluate earlydetection biomarkers. Here we evaluate the most promising ovarian cancer screening biomarkers in prospectively collected samples from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition study. Experimental Design: We measured CA125, HE4, CA72.4, and CA15.3 in 810 invasive epithelial ovarian cancer cases and 1,939 controls. We calculated the sensitivity at 95% and 98% specificity as well as area under the receiver operator curve (C-statistic) for each marker individually and in combination. In addition, we evaluated marker performance by stage at diagnosis and time between blood draw and diagnosis. Results: We observed the best discrimination between cases and controls within 6 months of diagnosis for CA125 (C-statistic = 0.92), then HE4 (0.84), CA72.4 (0.77), and CA15.3 (0.73). Marker performance declined with longer time between blood draw and diagnosis and for earlier staged disease. However, assessment of discriminatory ability at early stage was limited by small numbers. Combinations of markers performed modestly, but significantly better than any single marker. Conclusions: CA125 remains the single best marker for the early detection of invasive epithelial ovarian cancer, but can be slightly improved by combining with other markers. Identifying novel markers for ovarian cancer will require studies including larger numbers of early-stage cases. (C) 2016 AACR.
dc.format.extent23 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.pmid27060155
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/125704
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherAmerican Association for Cancer Research
dc.relation.isformatofVersió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0316
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Cancer Research, 2016, vol. 22, num. 18, p. 4664-4675
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0316
dc.rights(c) American Association for Cancer Research, 2016
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))
dc.subject.classificationCàncer d'ovari
dc.subject.classificationMarcadors bioquímics
dc.subject.otherOvarian cancer
dc.subject.otherBiochemical markers
dc.titleA prospective evaluation of early detection biomarkers for ovarian cancer in the European EPIC cohort
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
TerryKL.pdf
Mida:
587.59 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format