Mental well-being of the general population: direct and indirect effects of socioeconomic, relational and health factors

dc.contributor.authorSoldevila Domenech, Natalia
dc.contributor.authorForero, Carlos G.
dc.contributor.authorAlayo, Itxaso
dc.contributor.authorCapella, Jordina
dc.contributor.authorColom, Joan
dc.contributor.authorMalmusi, Davide
dc.contributor.authorMompart, Anna
dc.contributor.authorMortier, Philippe
dc.contributor.authorPuértolas, Beatriz
dc.contributor.authorSánchez, Néstor
dc.contributor.authorSchiaffino, Anna
dc.contributor.authorVilagut Saiz, Gemma
dc.contributor.authorAlonso, Jordi
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-25T12:17:10Z
dc.date.available2021-05-25T12:17:10Z
dc.date.issued2021-04-13
dc.date.updated2021-05-25T11:30:48Z
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim of this study was to analyse the association between individual mental well-being and social, economic, lifestyle and health factors. Methods: Cross-sectional study on a representative sample of 13,632 participants (> 15y/o) from the Catalan Health Interview Survey 2013-2016 editions. Mental well-being was assessed with the Warwick-Edinburg Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS). Linear regressions were fitted to associate well-being and sociodemographic, relational, lifestyle and health variables according to minimally sufficient adjustment sets identified using directed acyclic graphs. Predictors entered the model in blocks of variable types and analysed individually. Direct and total effects were estimated. Results: Health factors significantly contributed to mental well-being variance. Presence of a mental disorder and self-reported health had the largest effect size (eta2 = 13.4% and 16.3%). The higher individual impact from a variable came from social support (β = - 12.8, SE = 0.48, eta2 = 6.3%). A noticeable effect gradient (eta2 = 4.2%) from low to high mental well-being emerged according to economic difficulties (from β = 1.59, SE = 0.33 for moderate difficulties to β = 6.02 SE = 0.55 for no difficulties). Younger age (β = 5.21, SE = 0.26, eta2 = 3.4%) and being men (β = 1.32, SE = 0.15, eta2 = 0.6%) were associated with better mental well-being. Direct gender effects were negligible. Conclusions: This study highlights health and social support as the most associated factors with individual mental well-being over socioeconomic factors. Interventions and policies aimed to these factors for health promotion would improve population mental well-being.
dc.format.extent15 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.pmid33847868
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/177545
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer Nature
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02813-5
dc.relation.ispartofQuality of Life Research, 2021
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02813-5
dc.rightscc by (c) Soldevila Domenech et al., 2021
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))
dc.subject.classificationSalut mental
dc.subject.classificationCondicions econòmiques
dc.subject.classificationEstils de vida
dc.subject.otherMental health
dc.subject.otherEconomic conditions
dc.subject.otherLifestyles
dc.titleMental well-being of the general population: direct and indirect effects of socioeconomic, relational and health factors
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
Soldevila-Domenech2021_Article_MentalWell-beingOfTheGeneralPo.pdf
Mida:
1.25 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format