Delay Discounting in Gambling Disorder: Implications in Treatment Outcome

dc.contributor.authorMena Moreno, Teresa
dc.contributor.authorTesta, Giulia
dc.contributor.authorMestre Bach, Gemma
dc.contributor.authorMiranda Olivos, Romina
dc.contributor.authorGranero, Roser
dc.contributor.authorFernández Aranda, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorMenchón Magriñá, José Manuel
dc.contributor.authorJiménez-Murcia, Susana
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-19T12:49:28Z
dc.date.available2022-04-19T12:49:28Z
dc.date.issued2022-03-14
dc.date.updated2022-04-19T07:04:57Z
dc.description.abstractImpulsive choice, measured by delay discounting (DD) tasks, has been shown in patients with gambling disorders (GD). However, the impact of DD and treatment outcome has been scarcely explored in GD patients. The aims of this study were: (1) to examine the baseline association between DD and clinical variables in GD patients depending on their age and gambling preferences (strategic vs. non-strategic); and (2) to estimate the predictive role of DD on poorer outcomes of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) when considering also the effect of other clinical variables. 133 treatment-seeking male GD patients were evaluated at baseline with a DD task and measures of GD severity, personality traits and psychopathology. Treatment outcome was measured in terms of dropout from CBT and relapses. Results showed baseline associations between DD and GD severity (correlation coefficient R = 0.408 among strategic gamblers and R = 0.279 among mixed gamblers) and between DD and positive/negative urgency (R = 0.330 for the youngest patients, R = 0.244 for middle age, and around R = 0.35 for gamblers who reported preferences for strategic games). Other personality traits such as high harm avoidance and low cooperativeness were also related to DD at baseline (R = 0.606 among strategic gamblers). Regarding treatment outcome, a steeper discount rate predicted a higher risk of relapses in strategic gamblers (odds ratio OR = 3.01) and middle-age ones (OR = 1.59), and a higher risk of dropout in younger gamblers (OR = 1.89), non-strategic gamblers (OR = 1.70) and mixed gamblers (R = 4.74). GD severity mediated the associations between age, DD, personality traits and poor CBT outcome. In conclusion, impulsive choice affects treatment response in individuals with GD and may interfere with it to a significant extent. Considering DD in GD, patients seeking treatment could help control its impact on treatment adherence and relapses.
dc.format.extent14 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec723450
dc.identifier.issn2077-0383
dc.identifier.pmid35329937
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/185035
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11061611
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Medicine, 2022, vol. 11, num. 6
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11061611
dc.rightscc by (c) Mena Moreno, Teresa et al, 2022
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/*
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Ciències Clíniques)
dc.subject.classificationJoc compulsiu
dc.subject.classificationTerapèutica
dc.subject.otherCompulsive gambling
dc.subject.otherTherapeutics
dc.titleDelay Discounting in Gambling Disorder: Implications in Treatment Outcome
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
jcm-11-01611-v2.pdf
Mida:
1.23 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format