Comparison of two different lingual flap advancement techniques and vascular structure identification: a human cadaver study

dc.contributor.authorNoguera Mutlló, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorTraboulsi Garet, Bassel
dc.contributor.authorCamps Font, Octavi
dc.contributor.authorManzanares Céspedes, María Cristina
dc.contributor.authorBarbosa de Figueiredo, Rui Pedro
dc.contributor.authorValmaseda Castellón, Eduardo
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-24T18:52:29Z
dc.date.available2023-01-24T18:52:29Z
dc.date.issued2022-11
dc.date.updated2023-01-24T18:52:29Z
dc.description.abstractBackground: One of the most frequent complications in guided bone regeneration (GBR) is wound dehiscence, which compromises treatment outcomes. Thus, primary tension-free suture is essential to avoid wound dehiscence. The purpose of this study was to compare the extension of 2 different mandibular flaps in human cadaveric specimens, and to measure the size of the supraperiosteal blood vessels. Material and methods: Five freshly unfrozen human cadaveric specimens were used. Arteries and veins were marked and bilateral classical lingual flaps (extending from the second premolar to the retromolar area) were prepared. In one side, the mylohyoid muscle was detached to increase the coronal extension of the flap. An implant drill was used to measure the extension of the flap after exerting 30 g of traction, before and after detaching the mylohyoid muscle. The size of the largest vascular structures of the flap was measured using a periodontal probe. Results: The classical flap extension was 5.99 mm (95% confidence interval (CI): 5.08 to 6.90), while the coronally advanced flap extension with mylohyoid muscle detachment was 14.96 mm (95%CI: 10.81 - 19.11). A statistically significant difference was found between the 2 groups (p= 0.0002), with a mean extension difference was 8.97 mm (95%CI: 5.02 to 12.91). The mean largest artery had 0.20 mm of diameter (95%CI: 0.15 - 0.26). Conclusions: The detachment of the mylohyoid muscle from the lingual flap allows to significantly increase its extension by 2.5 times. The superficial arteries found in the lingual flap have a small diameter (around 0.2mm).
dc.format.extent7 p.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.idgrec727602
dc.identifier.issn1698-4447
dc.identifier.pmid36244000
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/192564
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherMedicina Oral SL
dc.relation.isformatofReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.25451
dc.relation.ispartofMedicina Oral, Patología Oral y Cirugia Bucal, 2022, vol. 1 (27), num. 6, p. e-532-e-538
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.25451
dc.rights(c) Medicina Oral SL, 2022
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.sourceArticles publicats en revistes (Patologia i Terapèutica Experimental)
dc.subject.classificationMedicina regenerativa
dc.subject.classificationCadàvers
dc.subject.classificationCirurgia dels ossos
dc.subject.classificationMaxil·lars
dc.subject.otherRegenerative medicine
dc.subject.otherCadavers
dc.subject.otherSurgery of bones
dc.subject.otherJaws
dc.titleComparison of two different lingual flap advancement techniques and vascular structure identification: a human cadaver study
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Fitxers

Paquet original

Mostrant 1 - 1 de 1
Carregant...
Miniatura
Nom:
727602.pdf
Mida:
1.46 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format